Taralabs cables

"I will say this one time, stay off this thread!
Sorry Keith, but you cannot control a public forum.

I personally have compared many cable’s to taralab’s top cable’s

No you haven’t Keith.

all the choices I’ve listened to sound broken in comparison!

Only to you, in your highly biased mind.

@calvinj , @rsf507 , it really is sad to watch a clueless man walking around muttering to himself. You would think that Tara Labs would be embarrassed and ashamed to have their name associated with a thread where one man simply talks to himself endlessly, but who knows?
Maybe Matthew Bond figures that there is no such thing as bad publicity.

I know that this thread is one of the reasons that I have stayed away from Tara Labs cables. I would be too embarrassed to tell anyone here that I owned them due to this thread."

Very well said...thanks to the poster above and to others who have tried to inject logic into this thread.

For Keith/alternate IDs and friends: This thread needs to die (IMHO-only) and the copy-pasting needs to end please.  

BTW, SuperAnnealing as referenced by Tara is a sophisticated process and they have trademarked their variant of it but they by no means invented the concept of super annealing. They do many great things in their conductors, starting with their SAOF-8N wire and their rectangular conductor approach and their particular variant of SA.

Annealing has been written about in detail since 1904 and extremely advanced annealing variants in semi-conductor and other markets (including high-end wire and electronics production) particularly over the past 20 years are more. Here's one example;

https://www.google.com/patents/US8349724

There are quite a few others as well.  

You would do Tara a big favor by stopping this way of "supporting them". You are putting so many people off from considering the brand that it defies logic.  Why not simply support them by using the style of user testimonial your wrote in 1 great paragraph, which was very good by the way, that's on their website? You'd help them a lot more if you took this approach versus the one you use on this forum. 

Zephyr24069, Allow me to correct you,  here is a list of cable's I have owned or  listened to, high fidelity,  transparent,  shunata research,  Mit, xlo, esp,  nordost, monster Cable,  audioquest, virtual dynamics, analysis plus, cardas, Jorma design,  crystal cable, purist audio design,  siltech, Van den hull, synergistic research, Kimber cable , etc...,    Sure I've not heard all cable's,  lol!, this is a sufficient amount over the year's , my preference remains tara lab's,  Also,  I will mention the world wide email's, phone call's  about tara labs cable's because of this thread has been very informative to to audio enthusiast everywhere,  It is quite exciting to associate with people that I never would otherwise,  that is my enjoyment from this informative thread about Tara lab's. 

I stand properly corrected; you've owned or done detailed testing with EVERY major brand of cables and model thereof in the world,...WOW!  For the rest of your response, I am afraid you are missing my point (again). The objection/constructive criticism is not that you are supporting the brand but it is how you are chipping away are people's perception of the brand by the way in which simply continue to copy-paste tons of text time and time again. People can find all that out there...post things that are new, unique and your own opinion. For the record (again) I'll say what you sent to Tara that's actually on their website under your UserID is great feedback and I am sure, helped some potential or current customer.

'nough said...have a great day!