My $0.02 worth.
There are pros and cons to each technology- no universal best choice.
Front projection is best, but its not for everyone; e.g., need to control ambient lighting.
For flat screen, you should weigh screen size, viewing distance, and cost to decide between flat panel and rear projection.
For rear projection, which is what I own, microdisplay sets are much better than CRT based sets IMHO, YMMV. For microdisplay, I would consider DLP or LCOS/SXRD over LCD RP. I would opt for the new generation of 1080p native resolution sets- picture quality is better independent of the resolution of the source material.
One observation from my own personal experience: I sit about 10' from the TV in my HT and I have a 61" screen. I do not consider this too large. I would not want a smaller screen size. I would like to upgrade to a 65" - 70" 1080p set!
Hope this helps,
Bruce
There are pros and cons to each technology- no universal best choice.
Front projection is best, but its not for everyone; e.g., need to control ambient lighting.
For flat screen, you should weigh screen size, viewing distance, and cost to decide between flat panel and rear projection.
For rear projection, which is what I own, microdisplay sets are much better than CRT based sets IMHO, YMMV. For microdisplay, I would consider DLP or LCOS/SXRD over LCD RP. I would opt for the new generation of 1080p native resolution sets- picture quality is better independent of the resolution of the source material.
One observation from my own personal experience: I sit about 10' from the TV in my HT and I have a 61" screen. I do not consider this too large. I would not want a smaller screen size. I would like to upgrade to a 65" - 70" 1080p set!
Hope this helps,
Bruce