The awful truth about CDs, do they have the same shelve life as LP's ?


The answer is properly not. Recent studies have shown that the chemicals used in their manufacture of CDs have reduced their life expectancy to ten years, not all but many, as per Paul Mcgowans email. The suggestion was given that if you have suspect CD's they should be re-copied. But my question is how do you identify these? I can tell you that I have a great deal of LPs and I can play anyone of these with great success and some are 40 years old. This no doubt would give some audiophiles another good reason to hold onto their belief that LPs are the way to go.
phd
Count me in as having about 500 CDs dating back to the 80s, and never having one CD go bad on me - with one exception.  Back about 8-10 years ago I decided to find out why they were so popular, so I bought a Nickleback CD.  That one was awful right out of the box.

In 30 of me buying cds I only ever had an erosion problem with ONE. Thats one out of 2700.

Problems I have with Lps over 40 years . Lost count.

There is nothing wrong  with Cds other than people suddenly declaring them out of fashion.
    I have many CDs over 30 years old, and have not experienced any aging problems with them. 
I have ripped all my CDs to NAS redundant drives (and now wonder what to do with the boxes of CDs I have) and have hit  a double handful or so that won't read in part or in whole.

My sample size is currently 3,679 CDs.