jinjuku
"Wait, so people can have positive results totally sighted, negative results when the answers are taken away before hand?"
I didn’t say that. Nor do I think the statement is true.
"So you are saying sighted evaluation is the legitimate way to go about this and controlling for confirmation bias is not?"
No, I’m not saying that at all. I’m saying ALL tests are subject to a whole range of potential problems and issues. Consequently, one test cannot prove anything. Especially if results are negative. Too many things can and do go wrong.
"Ergo: sighted means everything goes ’correct’ and bias controlled evaluation means everything can go wrong."
I’m not saying that at all. I don’t think it’s true, either.
"In your setup, if you have a layer 3 managed switch, and I turn on link aggregation and supply a generic CAT6 cable that all bets are off because now everything is wrong?"
I don’t agree with that statement. I don’t even know what that statement is supposed to mean. 😄