Digital Cable - Pixelization during motion


Hello Audioigoners,

I don't claim to be a videophile by any notion of the word... Though I'm sure I would be if I had $$$

I have a normal, non-HD CRT 27" TV and Comcast digital cable. As I was sitting down last night to watch the pinnacle of consumer entertainment AKA "American Idol" I was extremely disturbed. Not only from the content, but even more so from the phenominon my TV was producing.

A Static image looks OK, but whenever there is movement, there is pixelization. The images look "chunky." Fast movement makes the entire screen look like a hodge-podge of convoluted colors and shapes. It looks like playing back an MPEG vieo file on a 486 conputer whose CPU is not fast enough to keep up.

To me, this problem is completely unbearable. It starts as a minor distraction, then it become all I can focus on, then it gets even worse and makes me ill. It disturbs my inner balance, and frankly, seeing it makes me 'not OK' with the world.

I have noticed this at various friends houses as well who also have digital cable.

I CAN'T be the only one who's seeing this. I've never seen this phenominom in the many years that I've used analog cable.

Questions:
* What is causing this?
* Do all digital cable receives/services/whatevers have this problem? Or is there some band-aid that can fix it?
* Does satellite TV (DirecTV or DISH) have this problem at all?
* HOW DO YOU GUYS COPE?!?!?
goatwuss
Not all cable plant is created equal. In some areas--actually--in some parts of some areas, the S/N can be quite good and in others, the S/N quite bad. Whether the operator has upgraded plant recently can also be a factor, as well as what got installed by the prior operator (there has been a lot of consolidation in the industry).

As far as capacity, sure, a satellite provider can send more video channels than an old analog CATV setup. Most CATV systems are not "old analog CATV setups" anymore. And, newer CATV systems with digital have capacity that is competitive with satellite--if you are lucky enough to be in an area where Verizon is deploying FiOS, you will have more capacity than you know what to do with--its fiber optic cable to your house... B'sides, the satellite guys are running out of capacity too--both Dish and DirecTV keep adding new satellites to offer more HD and local channels (since most satellites "see" the entire continental US, they chew up a lot of bandwidth when offering "local" channels because those tend to get broadcast to people who will *never* watch them--can't see wanting to watch NBC's local broadcast for Billings, MT in DC (OK, this is a bit of a simplification b/c they can use spot beams to narrow the problem a *little* bit)). The drawback is that you need more LNBs to receive those signals--your antenna suddenly has to be able to "see" three birds instead of just one. Makes optimizing reception harder and some birds are better placed than others for reception by users in different parts of the country. The signal from the three also may tend to go out of whack more because the precision needed to "point" and get three birds has to be higher, hence more wind effects.

Given all of that, the "losses" inside your house are probably fairly inconsequential. If you have old coax in your house, like RG58, you might consider replacing it with RG6. If you have it running through a lot of splitters, try to rework the topology to get rid of them and replace those that you need with high bandwidth, low noise splitters. Do any inside wiring runs in ways to limit the length of the runs, as much as possible. Make sure connectors are tight--that does make a difference. If you do that, inside wiring have the same impact as between CATV and satellite. Frankly, if you do those things, your signal quality is going to then depend upon the quality of the signal fed to your house--what comes off the antenna for satellite (which may be impacted by factors beyond your control) and what S/N you get in your location from your CATV provider (which may be totally beyond your control).

You can't simply make assertions that "CATV rocks and satellite sucks" or vice-versa. Unless you want on-demand, in which case satellite does suck.
would a signal booster or house amplifier to boost the magnitude of the cable signal coming into the house make a difference? If I'm not mistaken, these house amps cost about 50.00 and can increase signal strength...
Singal boosters/amplifiers also amplify noise. They may help and they may not. probably only a real issue if you have too many splitters. Edsilva is right on- there are LOTS of factors that affect the PQ you get. In my case, cable was better than sat, but as I said, the analog cable at my house at the beach is way better than my house here in West Hartford.