As a person with a studied familiarity with established and validated scientific testing protocols I am not familiar with the term discrimnation elimination?I meant bias elimination (that of sighted input).
It is a common error made by those lacking in scientific discipline to underestimate and oversimplify the requirements needed to conduct statistically valid scientific testing irregardless of the discipline under consideration in this case the components that comprise a Music Reproduction System.And anyone that is a subject matter expert is more than free to weigh in. My proposed method will either stand or modify based on input.
Please also understand that I’m not out to find general norms per-se. I’m testing individual claims. If there are a group of people making the same claims then the N simply increases.
Again if some one says they can jump 20 feet straight up, the bar to jump over isn’t being evaluated, it’s the claim of covering 20 vertical feet.
I don’t have a ’verity of beliefs’. I have data that leads me to a conclusion that:
verity of your beliefs.
1. I can’t hear the difference between 315 foot of generic CAT5 and 12 foot of boutique CAT8
2. Three other people that have tried the ADC’d tracks can’t tell when 315 foot or 12 foot of cabling was in play
3. No one has debunked my DA/AD setup is of inadequate resolution
4. So far I’ve interacted with 12 audiophiles that believe in the audibility of a data cable but I can’t give $2000 away.
Even in this thread no one that has DL’d the tracks has hazarded a guess.