Harvard newspaper article on Analog vs. Digital

erik_squires04-21-2017 10:31pm

teo_audio Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 2,197 posts 04-28-2017 at 02:25pm Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete What I'm trying to say, is that these people don't have the question correct, or even complete, so their answers will be totally off the mark and wrong headed.
schubert Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 7,386 posts 04-28-2017 at 10:20pm Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete Brain runs the show alright.
kijanki Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 4,428 posts 04-30-2017 at 03:57pm Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete teo_audio He is not talking about digital vs. analog in general but about particular difference - the lack of noise in digital. I'm not sure if it is a tape hiss or surface noise but, according to him, it suppose to improve reception of music. It suggests that adding noise to live acoustic performance in very quiet place, would improve it.
ejr1953 Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 915 posts 05-11-2017 at 08:25pm Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete Interesting Youtube on analog tape recorders: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cet1Gvy9NI8
geoffkait Details Discussions Posts This discussion 23,365 posts 05-11-2017 at 09:10pm Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete Hmmmm. All those so called artifacts and analog tape still sounds better than digital. Go figure. By the way that dude in the video is definitely not an audiophile.