Absolute top tier DAC for standard res Redbook CD


Hi All.

Putting together a reference level system.
My Source is predominantly standard 16/44 played from a MacMini using iTunes and Amarra. Some of my music is purchased from iTunes and the rest is ripped from standard CD's.
For my tastes in music, my high def catalogues are still limited; so Redbook 16/44 will be my primary source for quite some time.

I'm not spending DCS or MSB money. But $15-20k retail is not out of the question.

Upsampling vs non-upsampling?
USB input vs SPDIF?

All opinions welcome.

And I know I need to hear them, but getting these ultra $$$ DAC's into your house for an audition ain't easy.

Looking for musical, emotional, engaging, accurate , with great dimension. Not looking for analytical and sterile.
mattnshilp
Of course you did.  Many of us have the QX5/20 and bought it over all the Chord DAC's.  Many have the Dave and love it.  Different ears for all of us and different fits depending on the systems too.  

Matt, everyone is excited for you to get the DaVinci into the system.  It will be interesting now as you review TotalDac and some others as they come along.  How close will they come to a 35k DAC is what I'm interested in.  I think that's the real question. How close are we with 10 or 15 or 20k DAC's.  For many there is a point of no return, but for most, there is a line that can't be crossed.  I found that line to be 9K for the Ayre QX5/20, but I really liked the sound of the Brinkmann also for 14k I think it is.  It was very organic as I posted many many pages back.  I need to go listen again as they have a QX5/20 there too so I can listen in the same system in a room I know the sound of.  Should be fun.
@ksattic 
You shouldn't believe marketing.  They aren't the only ones doing it nor are they even the first.  I'm sure the DACs are nice but there are much better.

They are the only ones doing it THEIR way and it is very good, but not everyone's favourite. It is MUCH better than the much hyped Hugo which to me was  not great at all.


DAVE is a much more elaborate implementation of the same Tech than Hugo was...but there are many ways to skin a cat and many roads lead to Rome. The trick is to find which part of ROME you want to hang out in! LoL

@bar81 that's why I believe my ears. :) I had a chance to meet Rob Watts when he was in California two years ago and he went over his DAC technology.

One small point that makes me know taste matters. Rob does not think DSD can sound good, much less spectacular.

I can assure everyone that the "Chipless" DSD engine in my GG DAC (99% of the time) can make a believer out of the biggest anti-DSD  campaigners out there.  (There is always that 1% that will deny reality. LoL)

I love great music in whatever format and rule out none a priori.