VPI 2nd Pivot for 3D


I just installed mine and discovering my old records anew.  I thought I knew everything there was to know on the original pressing of Fleetwood Mac's Rumers......but no - there's more.  You immediately hear a more solid bass, but then the dynamics hit hard.  It sounds like my amp is on steroids.  More cleanliness, - everything is better.  Very highly recommended.
128x128stringreen
To be entirely fair the pressure on a main bearing can be up to 50 tons/sq inch and stylus forces commensurately large but who's counting ;)
Dear @moonglum : Thank’s, you are rigth and yes: who’s counting but me. Good.

Ignorance is the " war’s mother " and that’s why I always try to improve my ignorant levels.

@moonglum in confirmation to your posts and mine here high-ligths from specific experts studies on the subject and its importance:

"""

The stylus tip, when in good condition, touches the groove walls at only two points. The entire weight of the stylus and the structure which holds it is concentrated at these two microscopically small points. When this concentration of pressure upon the points of contact is calculated, we find it to be approximately 26 tons per square inch. The walls of the record grooves are, of course, subject to the same pressure, but only for the fraction of a second required for a particular section to move past the tip as the record rotates. The stylus tip must travel well over one-half mile of surface each time a 12" LP record is played...with 26 tons of pressure per square inch. """



""" The most interesting photos to me described the "infinite" amount of force applied to the groove by the spherical and elliptical stylus designs. These designs effectively rest on 2 round contact points about 80%-90% of the way down into the groove. Since the contact points are rounded, the contact area is infinitely small, so no matter what the tracking force, the tracking pressure at the point of contact is effectively infinite. """



""" Getting back to the ripples caused by spherical and elliptical styli near the bottom of grooves, there seem to be 2 forces at work. The stylus tip gets warm on the two contact surfaces after only a few seconds playing. At that point you have a hot stylus pressing infinitely hard against vinyl and this can easily create substantial softening (melting is not required, in fact melting is not the mechanism that creates the ripples). After the stylus has passed any groove location the after-effect of the stylus bouncing merrily along in the groove causes the rippling. ..... But there are so many stretching, bouncing, musical, pushing/pulling pressure waves being generated, some driven into the disc and some being generated as the stylus tries to drag the vinyl along with it, that as the soft vinyl hardens again, it reacts in a resonant fashion. ""!"



""" From page 975 : "because of the small area of contact that exists between the stylus tip and the groove, the pressure against the groove wall can rise up to many thousands of pounds per square inch. For instance, if the wall receives 0.7 g of force applied through the contact area equal to 2 ten millionths of an inch, the pressure is 7726 lb/squ.inch. It has been experimentally shown that with such high pressures and forces of friction between stylus and the vinyl, that the outer skin layer of the record material melts as the tip slides over the plastic and then refreezes almost as fast as it melted. It has been suggested that since the melting temperature of vinyl is about 480 °F that the same temperature exists in the contact area. If the record material is metal, which happens when metal mothers are played, then the pressure increases to 20,000 to 30,000 lb/squ.inch, and the temperature can reach 2000°F because there is no plastic deformation of the groove wall. This explains why styli made of diamond, which is nothing more than carbon, literally burn up or wear out in a couple of hours when they are used to play metal mothers. """


In my past post I don’t speak of other parameters that can increment/modulate those very high forces that per sé increment the unstability problem in the unipivots during playback.


The recorded grooves were recorded at different recording velocities according the music information needs this has a direct effect on those forces that push the tonearm bearing, stylus tip shape has its own effect as the stylus tip wear through the time that between other things increment the friction between stylus tip and recorded grooves in encrement on those forces, skating has an effect too as the VTF and SRA that it’s changing almost at each groove due to LP imperfections. Of course that self cartridge tracking abilities contributes too.


All those very high forces affects any kind of tonearm bearing designs but on unipivots is the worst case.


@stringreen , I posted:


""" As always I’m not talking here if we like what we are hearing through unipivots or dislike, this is not the issue but to stay nearer to the recording that means we need to stay with distortions ( of every kind. ) at minimum and unipivots can’t help to achieve that main target. """


That’s what I’m talking about. As unipivots does not exist any single tonearm design with out trade-offs and each one of us choose which trade-offs are better choosed to be nearest to each one targets. Unipivots are out of question to achieve my today targets.


It’s nothing wrong with you because your system today fulfill your targets. Fine, that's what each one are looking for.

Btw, thank’s for your invitattion and you are welcome to come at my place in México city anytime.


Regards and enjoy the MUSIC NOT DISTORTIONS,

R.


Btw, as always the post of that person came only to " hit me " ( obviously with no success. ) with no single fact because has no facts. Pity.

 "When this concentration of pressure upon the points of contact is calculated, we find it to be approximately 26 tons per square inch... The most interesting photos to me described the "infinite" amount of force applied to the groove by the spherical and elliptical stylus designs....Since the contact points are rounded, the contact area is infinitely small, so no matter what the tracking force, the tracking pressure at the point of contact is effectively infinite...At that point you have a hot stylus pressing infinitely hard against vinyl and this can easily create substantial softening (melting is not required, in fact melting is not the mechanism that creates the ripples)....because of the small area of contact that exists between the stylus tip and the groove, the pressure against the groove wall can rise up to many thousands of pounds per square inch."


Raul thank you so much for regurgitating this little piece of fantasy I had forgotten about it entirely you did a fine job with cut and paste cut and paste cut and paste. Of course it is wholly fantasy as it's faulty "logic" is based on "infinite" forces and a contact area that is "infinitely small" if you do not see the humor in this then something was lost in translation and perhaps you should read it again rather than just cut and paste cut and paste cut and paste because of course in the real world of turntables used in Music Reproduction Systems there is no such thing as an infinite anything!


Also Raul if you are going to engage in cut and paste cut and paste cut and paste rather than going to the trouble of actually doing your own arithmetic then you should credit your sources and further when you cut and paste cut and paste cut and paste you might want to be a little less selective in your cut and paste cut and paste cut and paste and include disclaimer language such as one of your sources clearly noted at the top of its page that reprinted this "material":

"Shure makes no claims as to the accuracy of the information in the text."


However I do thank you for supplying what I think will be the biggest laughs I get all week it is truly priceless what you have done here and I now realize that you probably really don't intend it to be taken seriously at all but are using a subtle form of sarcasm/humor to entertain us. Very very nice work but of course if I am mistaken about your motives then you will return to insult me as you have elsewhere in this thread under which circumstances I am quite confident that the moderators in their esteemed judgement will delete your remarks again as they have so many times previously regarding your commentary here.


Infinite! Funny! I track at about 2.1 grams what about you, Raul??? :) :)  :) :)  :)  :) :) :)  :) :) :)  :) :) *G* *G* *G* lol!!!





Raul thank you again I am still laughing away over you're logic that relies on the assumptions of "infinites" to arrive at real-world conclusions about tonearm pivots. To help you develop you're own arithmetic model rather than relying on the flawed work of others, here are some steps to follow.

After measuring the coefficient of friction as ratios between pivot points and accounting for the pivot-to-spindle difference as a variance on the ideal transference of rotational convergence, integrate the realtime consequence of the stylus to groove vibrational interaction with the cantilever assembly to arrive at a  deviation (from the theoretical ideal, of course) of the frequency output seen at the phono preamp input while carefully accounting for the impedance and resistive effects that the cables themselves introduce to the ac signal.  The resulting schemas can form the basis of the conclusion regarding the pivot friction forces that influence unipivot tonearms and this will help you synthesize extensible paradigms but please remember that the results you obtain will be limited to the specific example of tonearm that you have so carefully measured.

I do hope that you will share your results with this group so that we verify your calculations.