Directly heated triodes are quite linear devices, and they tend to take on the characteristics of the driver circuit.
The larger transmitting triodes (211, 845, GM70) are particularly difficult to drive, which is why you see some of the esoteric Japanese designs employing power tubes for the job.
The 300B is an interesting animal. It has a stereotype of being lush to the point of sounding bloated and slow. Again, this is a driver tube issue (let’s not forget about adequate power supplies, of course). You’d be surprised how "quick" a 300B amplifier can sound when driven correctly and I’ve heard very few 300B SETs that get this right.
Everyone has their opinion about various architectures (DHTs vs. pentodes, OTL vs. transformers, etc.). My stance has always been that there's a convergence in architectures as the designs get better and better. While I'm a big DHT/transformer coupled fan, I recognize that this is personal preference (no accounting for taste), and not an expression of superiority of one architecture over another.
Cheers,
Thom @ Galibier Design
The larger transmitting triodes (211, 845, GM70) are particularly difficult to drive, which is why you see some of the esoteric Japanese designs employing power tubes for the job.
The 300B is an interesting animal. It has a stereotype of being lush to the point of sounding bloated and slow. Again, this is a driver tube issue (let’s not forget about adequate power supplies, of course). You’d be surprised how "quick" a 300B amplifier can sound when driven correctly and I’ve heard very few 300B SETs that get this right.
Everyone has their opinion about various architectures (DHTs vs. pentodes, OTL vs. transformers, etc.). My stance has always been that there's a convergence in architectures as the designs get better and better. While I'm a big DHT/transformer coupled fan, I recognize that this is personal preference (no accounting for taste), and not an expression of superiority of one architecture over another.
Cheers,
Thom @ Galibier Design