Directionality of wire


I am a fan of Chris Sommovigo's Black Cat and Airwave interconnects. I hope he does not mind me quoting him or naming him on this subject, but Chris does not mark directionality of his IC's. I recently wrote him on the subject and he responded that absent shunting off to ground/dialectric designs, the idea of wire directionality is a complete myth. Same with resistors and fuses. My hunch is that 95% of IC "manufacturers", particularly the one man operations of under $500 IC's mark directionality because they think it lends the appearance of technical sophistication and legitimacy. But even among the "big boys", the myth gets thrown around like so much accepted common knowledge. Thoughts? Someone care to educate me on how a simple IC or PC or speaker cable or fuse without a special shunting scheme can possibly have directionality? It was this comment by Stephen Mejias (then of Audioquest and in the context of Herb Reichert's review of the AQ Niagra 1000) that prompts my question;

Thank you for the excellent question. AudioQuest provided an NRG-10 AC cable for the evaluation. Like all AudioQuest cables, our AC cables use solid conductors that are carefully controlled for low-noise directionality. We see this as a benefit for all applications -- one that becomes especially important when discussing our Niagara units. Because our AC cables use conductors that have been properly controlled for low-noise directionality, they complement the Niagara System’s patented Ground-Noise Dissipation Technology. Other AC cables would work, but may or may not allow the Niagara to reach its full potential. If you'd like more information on our use of directionality to minimize the harmful effects of high-frequency noise, please visit http://www.audioquest.com/directionality-its-all-about-noise/ or the Niagara 1000's owner's manual (available on our website).

Thanks again.

Stephen Mejias
AudioQuest


Read more at https://www.stereophile.com/content/gramophone-dreams-15-audioquest-niagara-1000-hifiman-he1000-v2-p...


128x128fsonicsmith
In the case of an electrical signal (or AC power) that is being conducted via wires the energy is conveyed in the form of an electromagnetic wave, which travels outside the conductor itself. That wave propagates at a substantial fraction (generally somewhere between 50% to 98%) of the speed of light in a vacuum. The exact speed depends primarily on the "dielectric constant" of the particular insulation.

Any electromagnetic wave can be considered to be comprised of photons, although the term photons is most commonly associated with a particular kind of electromagnetic wave, namely light.

As I indicated in an earlier post in this thread, in the case of an electrical signal that is being conducted via wires the near light speed propagation of that electromagnetic wave is intimately related to movement of electrons within the conductor, even though that electron movement occurs at a **vastly** slower speed.

Sfroyen’s comment that "the energy flow takes place in the dielectric surrounding the conductors -- including the surrounding air" is absolutely correct. Photons do not travel within metallic conductors, electrons do. Ralph (Atmasphere) has made the same point, btw, in prior threads here that have involved similar controversies.

Regards,
-- Al

fsonicsmith seems too informed and rational to post on this thread

he might as well be quoting Patti's favorite French poet here

same for almarg - BTW, it is obviously the neutrino flux interacting with the wrong way wire
There is some confusion as to what the difference is between current and the audio signal. The audio signal is the electromagnetic wave. The current is traveling at the speed of electron flow in the conductor, which is virtually idle, to whit,

"Electromagnetic waves propagate in vacuum at a maximum speed of 299,792,458 meters per second . For a 12-gauge copper wire carrying a 10-ampere DC current, the speed of electric current (average electron drift velocity) is about 80 centimeters per hour or about 0.0002 meters per second."

The electromagnetic wave is the audio signal. There is no electromagnetic wave in the power cord or in the fuse where the power cord enters the amp. As I said previously, most audio frequencies travel within the IC or speaker cable wire per se, the skin effect being that very high frequencies travel nearer the surface (skin) of the metal conductor. And what carries the audio frequencies? The electromagnetic wave, of course!

There is no law saying photons can’t travel in copper. In fact it’s the physical non symmetry of the copper ITSELF that gives rise to directionality. Now, if anyone wishes to argue that "directionality" is due to electron speed differences (due to physical non symmetry of the wire) that give rise to resistance differences depending on directios I might actually consider going along with that.

geoffkait

There is no law saying photons can't travel in copper. In fact it's the physical non symmetry of the copper ITSELF that gives rise to directionality. Hel-loo!

>>>>>Indeed there is. The laws are called Maxwell's equations and were published in the 1860s. They are fully relativistic and form the basis for all electric, optical and radio technologies. In fact they are also used to calculate the skin-effect. As I stated above, any asymmetry in the copper can only affect the electron motion -- not the photons (electromagnetic fields and photons are one and the same).
If somebody is interested in the math of electrical energy flow in cables, this is a good article in Am. J. Phys. (it's possible to read the paper without following all the math):

http://depa.fquim.unam.mx/amyd/archivero/El_flujo_de_energia_de_una_bateria_a_otros_elementos_de_un_...