"Yes it is a good starting point but lets look at just why that is?"
I would assume it would have something to do with system integration...
"I feel it was simply for the benefit of speaker manufactures"
Conspiracy Theory?? : ) Just joking.
"I think that on one hand it is good to have a standard but they should be honest and claim that those numbers are more geared to the minimum acceptable performance and if you have speakers that can handle more.....by all means take advantage of the better performance."
I couldn't agree with you more. That why its a staring point. If the sub integrates better with the speaker performance at a lower cycle, then great. If you have satallites on all channels, then 80hz isn't where you wanna stop. But if it integrates at a higher cycle, then set the crossover higher. Its all about system integration, IMO.
Drcruz - Sorry I missed your other question.
"Is 80hz the point where sound is no longer omnidirectional?"
I can't say 100% its 80hz, but its in this region and lower, bass does become more omnidirectional.
I would assume it would have something to do with system integration...
"I feel it was simply for the benefit of speaker manufactures"
Conspiracy Theory?? : ) Just joking.
"I think that on one hand it is good to have a standard but they should be honest and claim that those numbers are more geared to the minimum acceptable performance and if you have speakers that can handle more.....by all means take advantage of the better performance."
I couldn't agree with you more. That why its a staring point. If the sub integrates better with the speaker performance at a lower cycle, then great. If you have satallites on all channels, then 80hz isn't where you wanna stop. But if it integrates at a higher cycle, then set the crossover higher. Its all about system integration, IMO.
Drcruz - Sorry I missed your other question.
"Is 80hz the point where sound is no longer omnidirectional?"
I can't say 100% its 80hz, but its in this region and lower, bass does become more omnidirectional.