Geoffkait 8-19-2017
Huh? Not sure what you guys are arguing about.
Jim and I are not arguing, Geoff. We're having what I would consider to be an intelligent discussion of sincere and intelligent questions. That despite the fact that our opinions on the matter do not particularly coincide.
Almarg 8-18-2017
Yet it is also true, as we are saying, that the cable configuration he
recommends would negate the intrinsic directionality he is attributing
to the wire itself.
Jea48 8-18-2017
But do we really know that?
It seems to me that it is a necessary consequence of what I stated earlier:
Almarg 8-18-2017
If the two conductors in a symmetrically designed cable are run in
opposite directions (relative to what came off of the spool), then no
matter which way the cable is connected the two conductors will **both**
always be in the allegedly "correct" direction for half of each cycle,
and the allegedly "incorrect" direction for the other half of each
cycle. That follows from what I said in an earlier post in this thread:
Almarg 8-14-2017
When "the current" is traveling away from the component in one of the
two conductors it is traveling toward the component in the other of the
two conductors.
And it is **always** traveling through the input
circuit of the component in one direction or the other, aside from the
brief instant during each cycle at which the applied voltage crosses
zero, and the direction changes.
(To add context, I had
put quotation marks around "the current" to distinguish it from the
electromagnetic energy of "the signal," that being conducted via the
dielectric).
It would be a different story, as Geoff indicated, if the cable were constructed with both conductors in the same direction. In that situation, **if** the conductors are in fact intrinsically directional to an audibly significant degree, in a given application, then reversing the cable would make a difference.
Jea48 8-19-2017
Al,
Question.
Does the hot/signal conductor, of an IC, hold any
more importance carrying the audio signal from the source to the load
than the ground/return conductor?
If yes please explain.
If not please explain.
I would put it that in the case of an unbalanced line-level analog interconnect the hot/signal conductor may actually be **less** important than the ground/return conductor. For a couple of reasons:
(a)The resistance, inductance, perhaps skin effect, and perhaps other characteristics of the ground/return conductor may affect the amplitude and spectral characteristics of ground loop-related high frequency noise and/or low frequency hum.
(b)Those characteristics of the ground/return conductor may also affect the extent to which a small fraction of the current in the hot/signal conductor may follow a return path other than that ground/return conductor. Such as the AC power wiring (as in a ground loop), or possibly even the ground/return conductor of the cable for the other channel.
However, while those two factors can certainly be expected to have sonic consequences in some applications, and while they can create slight inequalities in the current being conducted in the two wires, I'm not sure how or if they might have a relation to directionality.
Best regards,
-- Al