Dear @billstevenson : No malign action here. I own, owned and heard several unipivots including VPI and as you I know what I’m talking about.
Your " facts " about can’t prove that I’m wrong in my main " at micro levels unstability in any unipivot tonearm ". Reason is that those measures were not made it to prove it but to prove other targets.
We have to know what kind of measures where and how to achieve it to prove a specific subject. This time: at micro levels unstability in unipivot tonearm designs.
Your " facts " were as something of every day audio discussion, like this:
""" measures shows that these two amplifiers mearsures exactly the same but sounds different ! ! ? ? ! """
Problem there, that we don’t know what to measures to explain why sounds different. Same with your old " facts ".
In the other side you posted two facts that proves what I’m talking about:
""" my Prime single pivot tonearm was recently modified and significantly improved sonically by the addition of a second pivot """
""" It is doubtful that anyone who does this will decide after experimentation that the 2nd pivot does not provide a positive benefit. """
2nd pivot according my statements provides better stability. The only change in the VPI 2nd pivot is just the 2nd pivot that is what makes the difference.
The OP statements in his thread confirm my point.
Bill, remember that those huge forces at cartridge stylus tip during playback " makes " its works, the movements in the stylus tip has no precise pattern due that happens at random.
Here it’s not who has the reason, it’s only " common sense ". I respect what you posted but unfortunatelly does not proves what you think are proving. At least not if I’m wrong for this you need different " facts ".
Btw, you can make your research and try to learn ( for sure. ) what measures we have to do that can explain my point or better yet: that can explain why I'm wrong !. You was whom ask for facts due that those two stamentes posted by you were not enough for you be satisfied ! ? ! ?
Regards and enjoy the MUSIC NOT DISTORTIONS,
R.
Your " facts " about can’t prove that I’m wrong in my main " at micro levels unstability in any unipivot tonearm ". Reason is that those measures were not made it to prove it but to prove other targets.
We have to know what kind of measures where and how to achieve it to prove a specific subject. This time: at micro levels unstability in unipivot tonearm designs.
Your " facts " were as something of every day audio discussion, like this:
""" measures shows that these two amplifiers mearsures exactly the same but sounds different ! ! ? ? ! """
Problem there, that we don’t know what to measures to explain why sounds different. Same with your old " facts ".
In the other side you posted two facts that proves what I’m talking about:
""" my Prime single pivot tonearm was recently modified and significantly improved sonically by the addition of a second pivot """
""" It is doubtful that anyone who does this will decide after experimentation that the 2nd pivot does not provide a positive benefit. """
2nd pivot according my statements provides better stability. The only change in the VPI 2nd pivot is just the 2nd pivot that is what makes the difference.
The OP statements in his thread confirm my point.
Bill, remember that those huge forces at cartridge stylus tip during playback " makes " its works, the movements in the stylus tip has no precise pattern due that happens at random.
Here it’s not who has the reason, it’s only " common sense ". I respect what you posted but unfortunatelly does not proves what you think are proving. At least not if I’m wrong for this you need different " facts ".
Btw, you can make your research and try to learn ( for sure. ) what measures we have to do that can explain my point or better yet: that can explain why I'm wrong !. You was whom ask for facts due that those two stamentes posted by you were not enough for you be satisfied ! ? ! ?
Regards and enjoy the MUSIC NOT DISTORTIONS,
R.