Are future improvements in Amp/PreAmps slowing to a crawl?

I think at this point I would be better off returning to this thread when I have put together an illustration of the total process. I will have something I can post to my website as well. I need to have something the average person can relate to.

This is stealing from my lab time (and that's a no no)

Thanks for the back and forth.

Roger

I love how he stays "in character" throughout the thread.  This is high level performance art!

The only "high level performance" is in my amplifiers.

Do you honestly think I'm blowing smoke or selling snake oil?

Since you have consistently avoided answering a rather simple question, one that **should** have been very easy, I'm forced to conclude regardless of what I want to believe that the correct answer to the question above is 'yes'.

Here's why: you claim to have a circuit to correct this 'speed' issue. At this point we don't have to know anything technical about it; its mere alleged existence points to a means of quantifying the 'speed' of an amplifier circuit, which it then corrects. This has been true apparently for some years as there is another thread on this site wherein this circuit is discussed, and that thread is several years old.

But apparently despite the existence of this circuit, it has not helped in the means of measuring the speed of the amplifier circuit, which it surely must do, otherwise how could it correct; for that matter you would have to have a reference to know how to set the 'speed'. The logical issue here is obvious: obviously the 'circuit' does not exist. Otherwise you would have a specification to look for so that when you shipped a product out the door, you would know it was correct.

Pissing contest. That's exactly what Pass was talking about - a lot of that but virtually no progress.
I won.