Most Important, Unloved Cable...


Ethernet. I used to say the power cord was the most unloved, but important cable. Now, I update that assessment to the Ethernet cable. Review work forthcoming. 

I can't wait to invite my newer friend who is an engineer who was involved with the construction of Fermilab, the National Accelerator Lab, to hear this! Previously he was an overt mocker; no longer. He decided to try comparing cables and had his mind changed. That's not uncommon, as many of you former skeptics know. :)

I had my biggest doubts about the Ethernet cable. But, I was wrong - SO wrong! I'm so happy I made the decision years ago that I would try things rather than simply flip a coin mentally and decide without experience. It has made all the difference in quality of systems and my enjoyment of them. Reminder; I settled the matter of efficacy of cables years before becoming a reviewer and with my own money, so my enthusiasm for them does not spring from reviewing. Reviewing has allowed me to more fully explore their potential.  

I find fascinating the cognitive dissonance that exists between the skeptical mind in regard to cables and the real world results which can be obtained with them. I'm still shaking my head at this result... profoundly unexpected results way beyond expectation. Anyone who would need an ABX for this should exit the hobby and take up gun shooting, because your hearing would be for crap.  
douglas_schroeder
I only trust what I perceive and hear. If one has been around audio for awhile, you have likely bought, or at least tried, some gear that had amazing specs only to find it sounds like crap. As such, I have very little interest in techno measurements,

Consider that it is a compliment to Blue Jeans that they can make a tested, spec provided  6A Ethernet cable for less than one-tenth of what it costs me to obtain a 2% improvement. I have spent a whole lot more for a 1% improvement. Why? Because if you can get a few percent here and there over a period of years it is a combined 20+% improvement.

As many audiophiles know, improvements in your sound are on a steep exponential cost curve, especially when you have already invested the time and money to have a solid "base" of equipment making excellent sound already. And sometimes this means going in a direction that others consider to be backwards in the areas of technology, cost, design, power, etc.

So, yes, to me a 2% improvement is a "world of difference" because it was an expensive, time consuming and perhaps fun battle to achieve. More importantly, It is more enjoyable to listen,  Is there better sounding equipment than mine? Definitely. But the goal we share is to improve our system within each of our own constraints of time, money, desire, wife acceptance (if applicable), hearing and basic reality.

My associates at work occasionally ask as to what kind of music do I listen. The only answer I have been able to pull together as an honest response is that I look for what is "musical.."  And that defies all the genre categories.

So, enjoy the music and fiddle with your sound quality as you feel is most appropriate. 



Would it be presumptuous of us to expect an apology from jujitsu after his little get together? 😛

@geoffkait

I don’t recall ever seeing you apologize. And you probably hold the record on audiogon for belittling folks and calling them sarcastic names. Your standard tactic being to insult the person rather than address the points in a discussion.

So I am not sure why you of all people should be affronted and feel you are deserving of an apology for your wee hurt little feelings 😰😰😰

And I suspect you presume too much that you actually speak for "us" - being I suppose all your wee brothers and disciples here on the Gon...
Would it be presumptuous of us to expect an apology from jujitsu after his little get together?

Geoff,

Exactly what would I be apologizing for? To date I've at the least used everyone's handle here.

WGutz,

I would like to see if the 3rd weekend in October will work for you 

My plan would be using Rene van Es's exemplar setup when he did a deep dive into the audibility of CAT cabling. I will simplify with a Cisco Switch that takes one input and has two outputs. With the LAG configuration the switch provides a faux MAC address that maps to the ports that are outbound to your Streamer/Computer/Endpoint. 

This will allow the cable to be switched at the Streamer/Computer/Endpoint with out causing an issue from the perspective of the source. 
Please provide a specific day and time as I would like to invite a few of my friends. I feel a simpler approach is to plug in each of the CAT wires directly and thereby avoid any issues of additional elements, such as the wire from the source to the switch.