Wolfe_g, my wife is the same. Although when I switched from towers to standmounts in my theater, she didn't quite care for that. Her hearing is quite sensitive, but she just doesn't care about audio whatsoever.
Ugly vs Gogeous speakers
I know speakers should be all about sound but I can't help responding to the look as well and this presents me with a dilemma.
I have owned B&W Nautilus 803's for many years and love the sound and value (excellent sound for reasonable cost). I would love to upgrade but I (and wife) think that the retro Star Wars R2D2 looking speaker (802) is nothing we would have in our living space.
What do others think the best looking / sounding speaker is? Do looks matter to you?
- ...
- 130 posts total
gdhal"Aesthetically speaking, "Ugly" and "Gorgeous" are in the eye of the beholder". I agree... IMO. The big Wilsons- ugly The Vandersteen Quatro CT, Magico, Magnepan- beautiful Volti Audio- http://voltiaudio.com/vittora/- very, very nice |
My wife and I recently downsized our empty nest home to a new condo. Our new digs are quite contemporary and the 30 year old Ohm Walsh 3's just didn't cut it looks wise. So I decided I decided to pull the trigger on a pair of Duevel Planets in a light silver finish which complimented our decor perfectly. I read several reviews on the Planets and felt pretty confident I wasn't giving up too much on the Ohm's and with the exception of a few Hertz down low they sound very similar to the much bigger Ohm's. As I now have a dedicated Man-Loft system (Maggies) the main great room setup is more of a "Lifestyle" system. It's fun when guests ask "what are those" and they're mighty impressed when I spin some tunes on them. So I suppose my foray into speakers based on how they look turned out OK, on a side note these are the only speakers my wife has approved of since my Martin-Logan Aerius speakers from some 15 years ago. |
- 130 posts total