Question for cable/wire naysayers.....

http://www.audioholics.com/audio-video-cables/the-truth-about-interconnects-and-cables

It's an old article, but simply written.  It's the basis for most naysayer's positions.

Whoa! Yikes!! Holy guacamole! That’s the bible for cable naysayers and pseudo skeptics, for sure!

IF that Audioholics article is the basis upon which naysayers base their denials of sonic differences among cables then they are working with a set of arguments based on false premises.  The article wildly overstates what audiophiles find as differences among cables to invalidate there could be any differences at all.  That article is a "literary turd"!

Hard to argue with most of his positions, but he does note that for a small set of cases, low capacitance cabling is important.

I generally tend to agree with, you know, science and data. But to each their own. 

What the 'science and data' crowd forgets is money. Who is going to fund the studies to show what the measurements are that pertain to sonic differences in audio cabling? There are very few people who even care enough about audio to set up even a rudimentary system instead of a Bluetooth box. Of those, an even smaller number will care about sound quality to the extent that we all do. So there's the market, what company can make enough money from that market to fund this research? Or is NASA going to do it? 

Much of the science and data we have was generated in pursuit of other goals, or in pursuit of a reasonable level of sonic accuracy. Often findings not related to audio have proven useful for us or the companies that make what we love.

So if you're focusing on 'science and data' you very well may miss a lot of great ideas because the money isn't behind them to 'do the study'. Just saying...