Pehare > .... Thinking back to the early 90's I had a system with Klipsch Chorus speakers & a Carver
Blindjim > Carver was the one named entity I was going to insert into this saga as an or the, exception to the rule. Carver’s Phase Linear amp line was around long before it was shiek or absolutely necessary.
It used to be all about tubes and horns. Or tubes and quite sensitive speakers and fidelity was not a huge priority right off. SQ took a little while to become popular. H.B. or was it, H.H. Scott was one maker that strove for a more pleasant presentation … among others. Fischer, Wurlitzer, RCA, etc. propelled the movement.
A dark theme IMO is what I’ve perceived with this big watts low IMP speakers.
SS became an option for the public mainly due to lower costs as speakers migrated away from the 10, 16, and higher ohm speakers to lower sensitivity sorts. SS also became cheaper to mass produce and economics alone made up many minds to switch gears into this new approach.
Its all changed slowly and suddenly to lessen the options for the sincere audio nuts intent on piecing together outstanding home audio arrangements.
My own curiosity in this surrounds the why of it all, more than who’s pushing this tendancy forward. A big flashing neon sign reading ‘MONEY’ keeps blinking in my mind as the rationale. Its just cheaper for speaker makers to knock out a 4 ohm design than it is to do higher IMP units. Amp makers then are all but forced to follow along, change, or quit the biz altogether.
As a true outside the box innovator, Bob Carber released a while back, a line source speaker system with great tube friendly specs in the not out of the question price range around the mid teens. Multi driver modular fully adjustable akin to Wilson and others. It is not an active system.
Fully or partially active speaker systems now seem the wave of future speaker systems more people can acquire and still have very good flexibility with a wide variety of amplification. That’s not an altogether bad thing I don’t think.