KEF Reference 207/2s, 3s, or Blade 2s

I was recently demoed with the Blades vs B&W802d3s
After all the hype round the Blades I was prepared to buy - and I am so glad I did not.
Compared to the  B&W 802d3 I found the blades lifeless and lack of detail
I had earlier heard the 207s at a friend's house (hence demoing the Blades) and was impressed, but he did have powerful Krell monoblocks to drive them - which is probably what they needed.
I am not surprised the Blades are heavily discounted - not a successful  product in my mind

"I am not surprised the Blades are heavily discounted - not a successful product in my mind". 

This is quite a great bit of news for me. I want to get some new Blades and a discount will suit me fine.

tatyana69, the Blades are universally hearalded as being one of the best speakers out there. 

If you heard a set of 207.2 at a friends and was impressed but heard them elsewhere and was not impressed wouldn't that get your spidy sense tingling?

Do you think Kef would have dropped $3-4 million dollars on the Blade project not to outperform a set of 207.2?

We had both speakers and the Blades smoke the 207.2 in every way, the 207.2 does have a slightly richer midrange. 

Blades are not heavily discounted, some of the ones here have been from stores which closed or dealers who lost their franchises. 

The Blades when well set up are fantastic and have excellent detail, a huge soundstage and very deep room filling bass.

What was the dealer using for gear? How were they setup?

So unless you heard both speakers in the same soundroom with the same gear it is impossible to tell why one speaker is souding good to you and another is not based on I would presume to be two entirely different rooms, with completely different gear?

Dave Owner
Audio Doctor NJ