What speakers for 10k?

"02-13-15: Mapman
"Anyone who tells you how something is going to sound just by looking at a spec sheet is full of it. "

I would agree with that. However, a good engineer will know how to put those specs to best use in order to meet the goal."

You're right, of course. The point I was trying to make was that there needs to be a blend between the science portion of the design, and the qualities that go beyond the specs. And that the designer not only gets that blend right, but they need some outside feedback as well.

I've been fortunate in that I have several friends that manufacture equipment. I occasionally take part in listening to new designs before they go into production. They always tell me they must get others opinions. Its not optional, because we all have different listening abilities, personal tastes and equipment. To me, doing it this way makes sense, and its also great to see how some of these products are made.

"02-13-15: Jughead
But the wavetouch will give my wife bigger breast!"

You're missing the whole point Jughead. There's more than one way to use the Wavetouch. Its a very simple, but useful technique. You Wave with one hand to distract her, and you grab with the other. At least, that's how I do it.

Yeah buddy! just got an email from wavetouch, speakers will ship sat, so I should have them sometime next week. let the breast enlargement begin. Yay!

Just one more "for the record" comment:

A device does not have to be proven to work, nor convince any PHD panel of experts that it will work, in order to be granted a patent. The criteria are "novelty" (it must be something new) and "non-obviousness" (it has to be something that is not obvious). So I could apply for a patent on an underwater disco strobe as a shark repellant device, and might very well get it, regardless of whether or not it works.

Duke
filed and abandoned several patent applications

Audiokinesis,

I understand your last comment, and I have no doubt that you're right, but what was it in reference to?