@oregonpapa:
Frank wrote:
"ps sez:
" Meanwhile, I’m gonna order some of Mad Scientist’s graphene- even with shipping it’s a heck of a lot cheaper than the high-priced spread .."
Frank said: " Old adage .... "A sucker is born every minute."
I have ordered some of Mad Scientist’s graphene contact enhancer and am awaiting delivery. So Frank, does that make me a sucker in your opinion?
Frank then wrote:
"Another old adage ... "You get what you pay for."
Frank, can you assure me that if I were to pay close to 10x more for Total Contact, it would prove to be approximately X times better than what Mad Scientist is selling?
I mean this sincerely, because I’m having a tough time understanding contact enhancers in general, and why one product would cost so much more than another, which appears to be quite similar, especially since they both contain graphene suspended in a special solution.
I definitely have heard improvements in my stereo rig from cleaning contacts including tube pins with Deoxit and treating with Deoxit Gold, but apparently the graphene contact enhancers are (far) superior. To me, and many other audiophiles, that’s an exciting development!
It’s my hope that some brave and qualified audio person(s) will eventually do a comprehensive and rigorous comparison between the best contact enhancers now on the market. Personally, I’d love to learn a lot more about these things.
Frank wrote:
"ps sez:
" Meanwhile, I’m gonna order some of Mad Scientist’s graphene- even with shipping it’s a heck of a lot cheaper than the high-priced spread .."
Frank said: " Old adage .... "A sucker is born every minute."
I have ordered some of Mad Scientist’s graphene contact enhancer and am awaiting delivery. So Frank, does that make me a sucker in your opinion?
Frank then wrote:
"Another old adage ... "You get what you pay for."
Frank, can you assure me that if I were to pay close to 10x more for Total Contact, it would prove to be approximately X times better than what Mad Scientist is selling?
I mean this sincerely, because I’m having a tough time understanding contact enhancers in general, and why one product would cost so much more than another, which appears to be quite similar, especially since they both contain graphene suspended in a special solution.
I definitely have heard improvements in my stereo rig from cleaning contacts including tube pins with Deoxit and treating with Deoxit Gold, but apparently the graphene contact enhancers are (far) superior. To me, and many other audiophiles, that’s an exciting development!
It’s my hope that some brave and qualified audio person(s) will eventually do a comprehensive and rigorous comparison between the best contact enhancers now on the market. Personally, I’d love to learn a lot more about these things.