Is my Amp OK?

Ah cleeds raises his head again. Do you have experimental data?

willemj

... I am a scientist and I cannot accept uncontrolled sighted experiments ... why do people put more faith in their owned flawed experiences than in properly controlled experiments?

If you are a scientist, you should be careful to apply proper logic. In your statement above, you’ve committed the logical fallacy of "begging the question," also called circular reasoning ( circulus in probando). It happens when an argument is supported by the premise. In this case, you support the proposition that only your controlled experiments are valid with the premise that all other tests not meeting your criteria are "flawed experiences." You then demand experimental data, which only furthers your ill logic.

Its the method that counts, and what makes science science. Do you have data?

willemj

Its the method that counts, and what makes science science

If you seek to pursue scientific method, you must also apply proper logic. Your repeated demand for data only proves your circular logic.

Data are only data rather than factoids if arrived at by proper method. That is not easy, but imperative. What would be your method?
By the way,  I did my classes on the philosophy of science, and I did my 10 hours a week of Latin at school, so no need to impress me.