Wolf_garcia
[ …question the efficacy of certain seemingly "faith based" tweaks at your peril! Even asking simple questions and foolishly expecting rational answers to them can result in being labeled a "troll" or "negative nancy" ........Golden Eared Uber-Qualified sophisticates who shamelessly promote certain things are "real serious" magic hat rack and directional fuse wire aficionados with money to burn. $300 contact enhancing goo that takes 80 hours to ultimately work its Complete and Astonishing System Improvement magic....should be accepted on faith as, after all, what the heck do YOU know anyway? Just order the stuff, smear it on your wires........]
What "questions" that have you been asking about the product? I can’t see any questions in the above statement for sure.
Do you consider you comment " Golden Eared Uber-Qualified sophisticates who shamelessly promote certain things are "real serious" magic hat rack and directional fuse wire aficionados with money to burn" to be a question? If so, you need to have a think about what the word means.
Perhaps pointing out that it costs $299 as you and others have done? No, that’s not a question either and it reflects an underlying assumption, and it in no way questions its efficacy, just its affordability. Or how pointing out about the fact that it takes 8 weeks to really take effect - is that question?
Derogatory statements - put downs, slagging-off, pi**-takes whatever are not "questions". Calling into question whether it is too expensive or takes too long to work (which is not a question!) has nothing to do with its efficacy either.
Essentially the "negative nancies" have decided, in advance that this product for whatever personal reason, can’t / won’t work. And that’s just being intellectually lazy.
I note that there has not been one technical objection to the links that I presented. So either people didn’t read them, didn’t understand them or simply feel that taking cheap shots is somehow an appropriate response when they are presented with information that they can’t incorporate into their world view.
[ …question the efficacy of certain seemingly "faith based" tweaks at your peril! Even asking simple questions and foolishly expecting rational answers to them can result in being labeled a "troll" or "negative nancy" ........Golden Eared Uber-Qualified sophisticates who shamelessly promote certain things are "real serious" magic hat rack and directional fuse wire aficionados with money to burn. $300 contact enhancing goo that takes 80 hours to ultimately work its Complete and Astonishing System Improvement magic....should be accepted on faith as, after all, what the heck do YOU know anyway? Just order the stuff, smear it on your wires........]
What "questions" that have you been asking about the product? I can’t see any questions in the above statement for sure.
Do you consider you comment " Golden Eared Uber-Qualified sophisticates who shamelessly promote certain things are "real serious" magic hat rack and directional fuse wire aficionados with money to burn" to be a question? If so, you need to have a think about what the word means.
Perhaps pointing out that it costs $299 as you and others have done? No, that’s not a question either and it reflects an underlying assumption, and it in no way questions its efficacy, just its affordability. Or how pointing out about the fact that it takes 8 weeks to really take effect - is that question?
Derogatory statements - put downs, slagging-off, pi**-takes whatever are not "questions". Calling into question whether it is too expensive or takes too long to work (which is not a question!) has nothing to do with its efficacy either.
Essentially the "negative nancies" have decided, in advance that this product for whatever personal reason, can’t / won’t work. And that’s just being intellectually lazy.
I note that there has not been one technical objection to the links that I presented. So either people didn’t read them, didn’t understand them or simply feel that taking cheap shots is somehow an appropriate response when they are presented with information that they can’t incorporate into their world view.