2. amps-preamps
  3. 133536-107867

HI-FI NEWBIE NEEDS HELP!

I am new to the higher end of music listening, actually I haven’t started the listening part yet. I have just purchased an Emotiva XSP-1 pre and a pair of Magnepan 1.7i’s. My listening room is 14x14 but one wall is not closed off completely and there is an additional open space connected that is 8x9. My budget has been unexpectedly diminished more by having to buy new connectors and speakers cables. I just assumed I would be able to use my old RCA connectors and my 50’ spool of speaker wire I bought from Radio Shack 25 years ago. I will pause while you laugh....Anyway, the jist of it is is that I’ve got $2500 left for an amp. I need advice on what would be good for my setup? What would last the next 25 years, as I am a poor man with expensive tastes and will probably not be able to make any further upgrades. Would something used and older be out of date technically in 10-15 years? Could I consider something new that would be adequate for that price point? Should I go mono or two channel? Thank you for your consideration and reply.
widespreadpanic
johnto
1,026 posts
 
I had Maggie 1.7 and just upgraded to 3.7i and can tell you the Parasound Halo 2.1 is a wonderful pairing. You have everything you need in this integrated. Usually demos or slightly used ones show up for around $1600.
Had Emos previously even with the high watt rating they just didn't put out enough ampage and were always blowing.
widespreadpanic OP
19 posts
 
@johnto 
the fuses on the emotiva amps were always blowing?
dynaquest4's avatar
dynaquest4
445 posts
 
I drive my XPA-2 pretty hard (especially when the wife is out of town) and I've never had an issue at all!  Also remember the Emotiva five yer warranty that transfers to new owners.
mr_m
1,900 posts
 
+1 Rogue....
kalali's avatar
kalali
1,977 posts
 

I actually enjoy reading views that oppose the mainstream and encourage the folks to continue presenting those views. No single view is always right. That been said, one point that I feel is critical to this debate and perhaps the ultimate arbitrator, is humans’ hearing physiology and how the brain processes the sound. Just like (almost) everything among us, our ears hear sounds differently. Like many others on this site I’m also an engineer, trained academically and have been practicing in the field for the past 36 years. So I believe in data just like our self claimed resident scientist. But I also believe our ear/brain process that data differently.

This debate is generally pointless since no agreement will ever be reached. Enough said.

More to discover