Whole House Mains Wiring -- Ping: Jea48 (Jim) -- & ALL Others for your HELP!


I had the following PM discussion with member Almarg.  As you can see he -- as always -- was quite helpful!  However, upon my suggestion to post our conversation for others to see and perhaps learn, Al readily concurred, but suggested for the questions that he couldn't address, he referred me to Jim [Jea48].

It should be noted that I drug my Atma-Sphere amp manufacture, Ralph Karsten into this conversation via email.  As generous and helpful as he always is, he too helped a bunch.  I haven't copied his single email because the below is complex enough, without adding more.

My hope is that where my assumptions are questionable or for my questions, others will respond.  

Our new house's rafters are about 50% installed, so the other trades will be in soon.  And I will have to soon inform our electrician of our needs.  But I don't want to request something that isn't needed.  More IMPORTANTLY, I don't want to MISS something that is NEEDED!  So your help in checking this thread is greatly appreciated! 

NOTE:  I've listed our conversation as Audiogon would -- the most recent post last.  So, the real important part for me, is getting answers to the set of questions I asked towards the bottom -- Today at 20:28!!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

mrmb (you)

January 27, 2018 23:49

Thanks Al! That's what I was seeking.

Speaking of electrical noise/hum, I just found a Martin Logan article speaking about pre-wiring https://www.martinlogan.com/learn/faq-prewiring-a-home-theater.php.).

It addresses one of my other concerns about inserting multiple dedicated circuits in one room. They advise to connect all outlets/circuits with the same ground wire. I've previously read that ALL audio components should be connected together -- i.e., on the same dedicated circuit. If one didn't tie 2-dedicated circuits together by using the same ground, I can see why I've seen that advice.

Have a great remainder of the weekend AL. And thanks for sharing your expertise on Audiogon and in this PM. It's appreciated!!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

almarg

January 28, 2018 13:37

Hi Mike,

 Thanks for sending the link to the article, which I hadn't seen before. A couple of comments on it:

 1)As you appear to realize, the benefit of the single ground wire approach they advise is that it would minimize or eliminate any differences of potential (i.e., voltage) between the safety ground connections of the outlets for the various dedicated lines, and hence any differences in potential between the chassis of components that are interconnected in the same system but are powered by separate dedicated lines. Which in turn will avoid ground loop issues that might otherwise occur.

 2)If the electrician indicates that such an approach would be problematical, due to either practical considerations or code compliance issues, using 3-conductor Romex (e.g., 12-2 with ground) for each of the dedicated lines should come close to accomplishing the same thing. And could very conceivably provide results that are just as good.

 In 3-conductor Romex the safety ground wire is symmetrically placed between the hot and neutral conductors. Therefore voltages that may be induced into the safety ground conductor by the magnetic fields surrounding each of the two current carrying conductors [current flow in a conductor produces a magnetic field around that conductor] will tend to cancel, since the fields produced by the two current carrying conductors are in opposite directions.

For further explanation see pages 31 to 35 of the following paper, which was written by a renowned authority on such matters:

https://centralindianaaes.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/indy-aes-2012-seminar-w-notes-v1-0.pdf

Best regards,

-- Al

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

mrmb (you)

January 28, 2018 20:28

Hello Al,

RUN LENGTHS/BALANCING:

I did recently find elsewhere as you suggested, that using 12/3 was a prudent approach, but thanks for seconding that approach.

We talked about Martin Logan’s single ground wire recommendation. And you mentioned that using 12/3 (verses 12/2) may well compensate, if code prevents the implementation of ML’s plan. I suppose if code allows the M/L single ground wire approach and then 12/3 is also used, that would be icing on the cake!

Because it’s a breeze to do while the walls are open, I believe I will put 2-20amp outlets in the most important room – the 2-channel one (just in case)! Residing therein will be: 1) Atma-Sphere MA-1 monoblocks; a Lampizator Golden Gate DAC and 2-Soundlab M1PX stats.

For now let’s ignore the Soundlabs, which will be about 7 feet from the rack and that wall’s outlets, and thus, probably on their own 15amp circuit. Would you recommend that the Atma-Sphere amps be plugged into 1 of the dedicated 20-amp outlets and the Lampizator plugged into the 2nd. 20-amp circuit? Or would it be better to plug all 3-pieces into the same 20-amp circuit (plugging the Lampizator into an additional receptacle on the same circuit)?

Ancillary to the question of what component(s) should be plugged in where: Would there be any sonic downside to installing a Wall-Switch for the 2-Soundlab’s dedicated line (and its ganged outlet on the opposite side of the room)?

That is, would a Wall Switch be some sort of sonic negative; because it was a part of that circuit (sonically deducting a positive, or adding a negative)? And referencing the Martin Logan’s single ground wire plan: I’m unsure if we tied 3-dedicated circuits together (both 20-amp ones and the 15-amp Soundlab one) with a single ground, if a Switch would prevent that process from being implemented? Or would a Switch somehow negatively affect the “single ground logic”, or simple be too cumbersome to install?

Lastly, if code will allow M/L’s method of using a single ground on all dedicated circuits for my room, it may be difficult to implement because of the distance the Soundlab's (7-Feet) are from the front wall outlets. Especially when considering that the Soundlab’s outlets will be 19-Feet from each other – on opposite sides of the room.

My concern may be unfounded, because being the neophyte that I am; I can’t envision how to implement a single wire ground for 3-dedicated outlets as far apart as mine will be. And overall, I wonder if would be good enough (in audiophile terms) to simply install 3-dedicated circuits and not be concerned with using the same ground for each? However this may be confounded by the fact that folks have suggested that if multiple dedicated circuits are used, one should make the wire length for each one as close to the same as possible. Without rolling-up and storing several feet of cable (in the walls or at the panel) for the circuits longer that the other’s, this would be all but impossible.

I apologize for my hyper-granularity or should I say my “analness” regarding this wiring issue, but that’s sort of the definition of we audiophiles isn’t it? At any rate, I appreciate your assistance in a topic that I’m flying blind on! After we’re all said and done here, for others to gain from your teaching, I would like to post our communications on Audiogon as long as you’re amenable to same. That’s the beauty of forums, many sharing/learning from ONE!!! But I digress…..

WIRE:

The plan is to specify Southwire’s Romex ® brand of Solid Core (vs stranded) wire – is Southwire Solid Core also your recommendation? But I’m confused about the type of Romex ® to use. I’ve seen various ones: with “XHHW” recommended over “THHN”, but also “NM” recommended. What say you?

WIRE GAUGE, MULTIPLE OUTLETS:

Additionally, I've found a piece posted by MSB to be informational. As you can see (http://www.msbtechnology.com/faq/how-to-wire-your-house-for-good-power/) their thesis is that gauge size is of utmost importance! I’ve found some disagreement relative to whether 8 gauge wire can be installed in an outlet or not -- your opinion? At any rate, can an electrician pull 8 gauge to the audio room and terminate it in some sort of junction box and go from there to my audiophile grade outlets? And then, is there any downside to ganging several outlets from one dedicated circuit? In my home theater area, rather than multiple wall outlets, I’ve found it more advantageous to use a power center such as the Furman Elite-20 PF I’m presently using. It has a video and a sonic benefit, plus I find DC Triggers to be useful. So, unless you believe ganged outlets are better than a Furman (et al), I won’t have the electrician install anymore outlets than I think will be needed when using a Power Center.

PANEL-TO-PANEL WIRE GAUGE AND CONNECTION METHODOLGY:

Should I recommend a specific wire gauge or type for the electrician to use BETWEEN the main 200-amp panels and the sub-panel? Should I ask the electrician to use a specific method to use to tie these panels together? One forum poster advised: “running one large wire from the very top position in the load center on the leg with the least number of noise-generating devices to a sub-panel”. Would this be your method?

BREAKERS:

I also found the following discussion from PS Audio (http://www.psaudio.com/ps_how/how-to-install-a-dedicated-ac-line/). It advised that 20-amp breakers should be used “for even the lowest draw source equipment feed”. I took that to mean that although the circuit may be less than 20-amps, that a 20-amp breaker should be used. Is that what you would suggest?

LOAD CENTERS:

So, my present plan for the 2-channel room (mentioned previously) is to install 2-200 amp panels and a 60-100 amp subpanel for the 3-A/V areas (to get it as close as possible to 2-channel audio room – is this your preference?

Speaking of load centers, I’ve found several positive mentions of Schneider’s Model: “Square D QO” Panels (the “QO” Model with copper plated busing). Does QO Square D model work for you?

GROUND ROD:

I’ve read rather lengthy dissertations on this subject. Not being interested in getting into the weeds here, is there a material, length and methodology you would suggest using here?

SERVICE:

And lastly, should I even be concerned about the wire/cable used for the service drop or service entrance? NOTE: Service will be buried.

IT’S ABOUT TIME….THE CONCLUSION:

Whew, I can’t tell you how much I appreciate you wading through all and helping with all of this!! It’s all but impossible to find folks educated in this subject such as Electrical Engineers and Electricians who care about the details we audiophiles do! So, I consider you a wealth of information on the subject form your previous responses to my questions but more importantly, from the number of posts and volume of information that you’ve posted on Audiogon and I’m sure elsewhere!!!

Be well and take care,

-Mike

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
almarg

January 28, 2018 22:06

Hi Mike,

Thank you again for the nice words.

I should have been more explicit when I referred in the previous communication to "3-conductor Romex (e.g., 12-2 with ground)," and subsequently to "3-conductor Romex." My reference to three conductors included the ground conductor, so I was referring to "12-2 with ground" and not to 12-3. The additional "hot" conductor in 12-3 would serve no purpose in this situation, and if that conductor were used to carry a current the benefit of the symmetry I referred to between the current conductors and the ground wire in 12-2 would likely be negated.

My suggestion of 12-2 Romex as a potentially suitable alternative to ML's suggested configuration was in contrast, for example, to using conductors within metal conduit, which as explained in the reference I cited would be much more conducive to ground loop issues. Especially when multiple dedicated lines are used to power the components in a single system.

Regarding your first question, my guess is that it would be best to put the amps and the DAC on separate circuits. I say that in part because various comments I've seen Ralph provide over the years lead me to believe that his designs are less susceptible to ground loop issues than most, and consequently there is unlikely to be any downside from keeping the amps and the DAC with its potentially noisy digital circuitry on separate dedicated lines.

Regarding a wall switch for the power to the speakers, I don't see that as being a negative in itself. However as you alluded to the considerable distance between the various outlets does sound like implementing the ML approach would be cumbersome at best. And perhaps more significantly the considerable length of the ground connection between some of the outlets may negate a lot of the benefit of that approach. So perhaps just using "12-2 with ground" Romex in the normal manner, for each of the dedicated lines, would be simpler, more practical, and provide results which are just as good.

Regarding the suggestion of keeping the lengths of all of the dedicated lines the same, which I too have seen stated a number of times and which the ML writeup implied is desirable, FWIW I am not a believer in that. In nearly all applications the different lines would be carrying very different amounts of current, and correspondingly their conductors would be surrounded by magnetic fields having very different strengths, resulting in very different amounts of current being induced in the ground wire. Not to mention that voltage drops in the hot and neutral conductors would be very different. So I don't see why keeping all the lengths the same would provide any benefit.

Regarding posting our communications in the forums, that would be fine with me. If you were to do so, or at least start a thread with some of your questions, chances are it would catch the eye of Jea48 (Jim), who is by far the leading expert at Audiogon on electrician-type (as opposed to EE) matters.

And for that matter, Jim would be the best person to address your questions about NM-B vs. XHHW vs. THHN, use of 8 gauge wire (which I suspect would be extremely difficult to work with, as well as probably being overkill), and most or all of your subsequent questions.

Regarding the question about PS Audio's statement that "we recommend you use a 20 amp breaker for even the lowest draw source equipment feed," though, I can say with certainty that it would be both unsafe and a code violation to use a 20 amp breaker on a circuit which "may be less than 20-amps." In other words, if a 20 amp breaker is used the outlet must be a 20 amp type and the wiring must be 12 gauge or heavier. What they no doubt meant, as you probably realize, is that even if the equipment powered via that line only draws a small fraction of 15 amps, they would still recommend a breaker, outlet, and wiring rated for 20 amps. Which would have no downside, and I suppose might provide at least a small benefit in some circumstances.

Best regards,

-- Al



128x128mrmb
Wow Jim, GREAT response!!  Ask and ye shall receive.  Thanks so much for your recommendations.  It sure helps me provide specific instructions to the electrician; whether I fully understand the technical logic behind the instructions or not.  Wiring should begin in ~2 weeks.

Contrary to your assumption which would normally be correct, the electric company sub-contractor does have a significant commercial and industrial resume, in fact, it's greater than it's residential one.

The good news is that our builder doesn't skimp on labor or materials. The bad news is we're paying for that (grin).  So, (2)-200 amp panels plus (1)-100 amp sub-panel were included in the estimate.  The question for my electrician is whether the sub-panel should be 60-amp or 100-amp.  From the following A/A thread, it appears that too much "headroom" (i.e. 100 vs 60 amps etc.) could be a problem:

QUESTION FROM AN AUDIO ASYLUM THREAD:

Q.  Is there really any harm in too much headroom if it doesn't cost too much extra?

A. Actually, there can be. When a load center is installed the electrician will attempt to balance each leg in order to create a symmetrical load on the incoming service. The way this is done is to populate each leg with breakers that are evenly distributed, kind of like this:

Leg1 Leg2

50 60

30 30

20 20

20 20

20 15

20 15

15 20

15 20

15 15

15 15

If you run a subpanel, you will put the breaker on one leg. If you run individual lines, it's best to put them all on one leg. If you vastly oversize your setup (i.e. a 100A sub-panel), and then only use say 12A of that capacity, you'll be putting an asymmetric load on the legs. An extreme asymmetric load is bad - bad for your appliances, bad for your power bill.

My builder has already greased the skids with the electrician by telling him I would have some pretty unique needs.  In turn, via email, I sent the electrician a heads-up of some of my general needs, including links to my gear.  Next because of your help, I will document the specifics of what we're desiring and place notes for him on the pdf's of our house plans.

I really appreciate your comments about the breaker box wiring!!!  That was one area that had me stumped.  Especially because the sub-panel will be dedicated to JUST A/V type equipment. 

I suppose installing a sub-panel is prudent.  The box is fairly inexpensive and it will be placed closer to the 2-channel audio alcove and the adjacent entertainment/home theater area. These areas are combined in a "L" type configuration. Only extend the bottom leg of the "L" to look like the traditional perpendicular drawing. The audio room is at 1-end of that leg and a bar is at the other end; with the H/T room on the other end of the "L".

Fearing as you suggested, that the bare minimum would be provided, I was happy to read your suggestion of feeding "the sub-panel with at least #4 copper or #2 aluminum wire".  Speaking of same, do you find any value in doing the connection as I found someone advised on another forum by: 
“running one large wire from the very top position in the load center on the leg with the least number of noise-generating devices to a sub-panel”?
Lastly, if it means anything relative to your service grounding commentary, we're in Indiana.  
All the best,
-Mike
Did not see it mentioned, you want to make sure you buy main and sub panel that have copper buss bar, Square D QO , Siemens, cutler hammer.

I ran a Sub panel like you want to I used 0 THNN which was way oversize for a 100 sub, glad I did. You may want to also consider whole
 house surge protection, wires right into your main panel.

One last thought, a lot of folks on dedicated lines, incorporate Isolation
transformers.

Congrats on your new home! 
Wow, this is great information.
Thanks, Jea48.
+1.  Great info indeed.  Thanks, Jim!

Mike, I don't understand the AA post you quoted.  In the stated example it seems to me that if the load is unbalanced by 12 amps, it is unbalanced by 12 amps regardless of whether the sub-panel is a 60 amp panel or a 100 amp panel.

Best regards,
-- Al
 
Al, if you don't understand it, I'm not knowledgeable enough to speculate one way or the other.  It would take about 3-minutes of typing to describe what I know about the electricity subject. Here goes:  I can re-set a circuit breaker, screw-in a light bulb and on a good day, change out a switch or receptacle; but anything more, I'm flying blind.  Hence, why this whole topic is such a mystery.  I can't help but think that probably is the case for many.  Which is exactly the reason why I believe a thread like this has such value to anyone in my position.  Someone with virtually zero theoretical and practical knowledge about power distribution.  Which is what makes you and Jim's commentary so valued!

I inserted the AA post because I thought it may help someone in a similar circumstance.  Hopefully, our electrician will know how best to balance the load and not install something that would be over sized, or present an "asymmetric load" -- as the A/A poster said.  
From the AA post above:
If you run a subpanel, you will put the breaker on one leg. If you run individual lines, it’s best to put them all on one leg. If you vastly oversize your setup (i.e. a 100A sub-panel), and then only use say 12A of that capacity, you’ll be putting an asymmetric load on the legs. An extreme asymmetric load is bad - bad for your appliances, bad for your power bill.

almarg said:

Mike, I don’t understand the AA post you quoted. In the stated example it seems to me that if the load is unbalanced by 12 amps, it is unbalanced by 12 amps regardless of whether the sub-panel is a 60 amp panel or a 100 amp panel.

Best regards,
-- Al
+1

~ ~ ~

A 120V 12 amp load?

What if the 12 amp load was fed from a single branch circuit? What then?

120V loads are changing all the time.

Yes by code the electrician is supposed to balance the electrical panel connected 120V loads the best he can. But he doesn’t know what the home owner might plug into any given wall electrical outlet. How about a vacuum cleaner? Most draw 12 amps.

Sure he can balance the circuits above the counter tops in the kitchen. He can put the circuit that feeds the microwave on a breaker fed from say L1 and the Dishwasher circuit on a breaker fed from L2. If they are running at the same time the two loads are somewhat balanced. What if the dishwasher is running and the microwave is not? Or the microwave is being used but not the dishwasher? Like I said 120V loads are changing all the time. The electrician tries to balance the 120V loads the best he can for the what if....

What you don’t do is move all the know 120V loads like the microwave, dishwasher, garbage disposal, washing machine, refrigerator, deep freeze, sump pump, and any other motor load you can think of to one Line, leg, in the electrical panel, so the other Line, leg, can be used for an audio system that draws maybe 8 to 10 amps tops.



jea48 said:

For audio equipment, system, connected together with wire interconnects it is recommended the dedicated branch circuits be fed from breakers fed from the same Line, Leg. All from Line 1 or all from Line 2, not from both though. In your case, If I read you posts correct, you have multiple A/V systems. You could balance the sub panel out by using line 1 for one system, connected together by wire interconnects, and the other system, connected together by interconnects, from Line 2.

If the electrician questions your directions, for feeding the dedicated circuits for each system from the same Line, just tell him the total connected continuous load is less than 16 amps. And the dedicated circuits are intended to be used to feed audio and video equipment only. That should satisfy him as well as the electrical inspector.
The sub panel 120V loads will be somewhat balanced.
The same if the 2 ch audio room was fed with a single 120V 20 amp branch circuit connected to say L1 and the HT room was fed with another 120V 20 amp branch circuit fed from L2. What is the total connected load to L1? What is the total connected load to L2? What are the chances both systems will be in use at the same time?

~ ~ ~

@mrmb,

Have you considered what you will be insulating the wall stud spaces with in the audio and HT rooms? Sound type insulation?

What will you be covering the wall studs and ceiling joists with?

Dry wall, sheetrock, I assume?
How thick?
How many layers?
Type of glue used between layers?
Resilient channels installed on wall studs and ceiling joists?
Example of:
http://www.soundproofing.org/infopages/channel.htm

What ever you decide to do the electrician will need to know before he installs the outlet boxes.

Type of lighting in the rooms.


Jim