A brutal review of the Wilson Maxx

If pressed for a response I would say I was in the "sounds good to me" school, but issues like this are never so clear cut. When I first came across Audiogon I would have place myself in the accurate reproduction camp, but two factors got me thinking. First, I developed a knowledge about studio recording techniques and came to the conclusion that it's virtually impossible to know exactly what the recording is supposed to sound like. There are just too many variables and artistic considerations involved in even a minimalist recording to really say what the recordings should sound like. Second, in looking at the virtual systems listed here on Audiogon I came to a deeper understanding of what real life audiophile systems were put together. I ultimately came to the realization that if you knew what you were doing, which presumes a good knowledge of audio equipment, the sound of live instruments and a the possession of a reasonably good ear, you could put together a wonderfully musical system that while not strictly accurate, still gets to the heart of the music. So much depends upon individual taste, both in equipment voicing and the particular type of music you play. One size will never fit all.

Bigtree, your recording friend may think he's trying to faithfully reproduce an original event, but ultimately he cannot. What is the original event? What he hears in center section from row DD? What the conductor hears at the podium? What it sounds like under the balcony? Who's to say, because the sound of the orchestra does sound radically different in each of these locations. The recording chain is by its very nature an editorializing process. A recording is not a piece of captured reality, but instead is a separate entity that through artificial means is an analogy of a distinctly separate event. It's not a trivial difference.

I like this guy Hardesty too. I also agree with what he says about freedom in the marketplace. Anyone should be able to make something and sell it for whatever they want. But, would you really buy these speakers based upon a review? After being out of the audiophile shopping mode for 15 years, I walked into a room at the S.F. CES show that had the Sophia's playing. I had never heard of Wilson's speakers. I loved the sound. After researching them and finding out the price, I shopped elsewhere and found speakers that did the trick for me for much less. Still, some people do not have the same concerns about money as I do. They are free to spend as much as they can, and as studies have shown, the brain responds to external stimuli based upon its perception of the source. So, maybe for people with unlimited budgets, the Wilson Maxx speakers do sound better. Hah!

David

Onhwy61, My friend has tried to catch the essence of the performance. You certainly can't recreate it from every perspective but I think he tries for what the average listener would hear in the center lower level of the better seating areas. However, I still think the reproduction chain should capture the "Sound" of real instruments to the point that they do sound realistic.
I'm well aware of "Artists" or recording engineers expression. That should still not mean that speakers can't reproduce instrumental tones properly even if the overall recording is questionable.
However, with what you have said, it stregthens my point. What are we trying to accomplish with high end audio since the whole thing is flawed and we don't have the "Absolute" standard. Nobody knows what the original event sounded like except from one perspective that they had when attending the event. It is a matter of interpretation.
Now, I do believe you can record individual instruments and you should be able to achieve a reasonable facsimily of that event, wouldn't you think? We have tried this and this is the basis for me using 1st order speakers. IMO, they sound closer to the individual instrument.

After listening to a good friend and his son two nights ago.
As they played their drum kits. I have yet to hear a speaker capture that kind of dynamics..I doubt that system exist.

The sound pressure levels in the room had to exceed well over 100 dB. His son at only 6 yrs old ran me out of his room. The intensity of the cymbals was more than my ears could bare. I've come to a conclusion that a long time drummer's hearing has got to be jacked up.LOL
There's no way you can play drums regular like I heard the other night for several hours at 110dB and still have decent hearing after a few years.

Strings seem the easiest instruments to imitate.Well except for the Bass and Cello. Some speakers make them sound bloated and draaaaawn out.
The Paino's over tones aren't too bad or the key strikes..but the weight of the piano seems difficult to duplicate on most systems.

I agree with Bigtee on the 1st order,phase correct or time aligned speakers. I haven't heard any other type speaker come as close to imitating certain instruments. Scale is a different story as most if not all systems would run out of steam before they could get that part right. It's a tough pill to swallow but measurements do play a part in getting the correct timbre and decay of instruments if the recording allows it.

Gmood1, I did the samething. A friend of mines son is a professional drummer. After listening to him practice a while---wow, no way will any audio system capture what I heard. It really shows the dynamic limitations that are imposed on the audio chain. When a couple of acoustic guitars were added in for fun, well, you really see what's missing in home reproduction.