@tommylion,
I understand the reasoning for your post.
But, having this discussion is a positive thing. Right?
I’m expressing my opinion based on Frank’s history. with me.
This is all I have to base my opinions on going forward.
So, in effect, you would have me (buy this product(), with all of the reservations previously noted and not have an opinion on his (attack) on me personally?
It has to do with the manufacturer, his choice of beta testers, how they react to the potential customer base, that will hopefully drive sales?.
For some reason, not yet known to me, you seem to want to make ME the scapegoat for the failure of how this product was rolled out? This is what I’ve said all along.
So, what you seem to want to refer to as a (grudge)..I correctly call it as a failure to understand the initial prospective of a new product and it’s correct influx into the marketplace.
I can take this one step further. Has Frank EVER questioned the posts from customers who’ve had positive experiences??
I don’t think so, Then I ask myself..why not? If Frank is such a respected reviewer, who’d want his reputation preserved, this, my friend, is of great importance?
I guess, I’m the only one who has ever questioned this?
So, I think it's important to actually remember how this confusion actually started. YOU seem to make me, a potential customer, out to be a "bad guy" or as @geoffkait would say, a suedoskeptic?
I’m questioning my previous decision to but a vile now? Thanks @tommylion.