Hi George,
just read your last post. The graphs from Stereophile are revealing. I’ll admit I’m not the best at interpreting the all data. I do know my PL HP intergrated sounds great in my system. A HUGE upgrade from my NAD m3.
As I recall didn’t the Stereophile review give the power amp a very high recommendation overall?
I can only imagine the SFGM must very revealing speakers having never heard them, that’s why I suggest trying out components in your system at home before buying, if at all possible, in addition to diligence in research. I agree with you. look at tests and listen as well. Good advice.
just read your last post. The graphs from Stereophile are revealing. I’ll admit I’m not the best at interpreting the all data. I do know my PL HP intergrated sounds great in my system. A HUGE upgrade from my NAD m3.
As I recall didn’t the Stereophile review give the power amp a very high recommendation overall?
I can only imagine the SFGM must very revealing speakers having never heard them, that’s why I suggest trying out components in your system at home before buying, if at all possible, in addition to diligence in research. I agree with you. look at tests and listen as well. Good advice.