I am a firm believer in TT mats . I purchased my Boston Mat 2 4 years ago to use on a SL1210 MK5 that I paid less for then the mat . I used that mat on top of the 1/8 stock rubber mat . I felt the rubber mat would help with the platter ringing issue and the Boston with the mechanical reflections from the stylus vinyl interface . This table performed very well until I upgraded to a SP10 Mk2 . The Boston is now on the SP10 with the 1/8 rubber mat and a K-Works ERSA Mat to handle EMI Issues . I stumbled on the K-Works mat by meeting Igor @ a listening session . I am familiar with ERS paper and use it . It sounded like a good idea so I tried it and it eliminated a slight amount of haze . I run a very LOMC cartridge .04 mv . It all adds up to better SQ.
- ...
- 99 posts total
@enginerd1960 Those mats desidned to be placed directly on the platter, why do you need your rubber mat in between? Micro Seiki CU-180 and CU-500 fits the platter of SP-10 series like it was designed for Technics, here is a picture of my CU-500 on SP-10mkII. |
I use the technique of constrained layer dampening . I look at a TT mat as doing two jobs . Isolating the platter form motor and external vibration & isolating the stylus from reflected energy coming back to itself . The Boston material choice of pure graphite is well suited for this task . The SP10MK2 is a little lighter on the platter then the MK3 and felt it could use more mass . As for the ERSA mat it made sense to me . |
- 99 posts total