I’ve got the P5 and the sub integration is flawless. The separate crossovers for sub and speakers is elegant and really cleans up the sound when compared to a unit with no sub integration. I’m not sure what issue the other poster had, but the sub features are quite good.
Also, the volume by remote gives increases in small increments and is a big improvement over the Nad C375BEE it replaced. The P5 also trounced the Nad in sonics and features. With an Adcom amp and good cables i’m seriously taken with the P5.
Get the Rotel as it’s what you want, but the P5 really stands out in the American market at the 1100 price. I had the P7 and I hesitate to say that the P5 images better, but I will say I prefer it over the P7.
Also, the volume by remote gives increases in small increments and is a big improvement over the Nad C375BEE it replaced. The P5 also trounced the Nad in sonics and features. With an Adcom amp and good cables i’m seriously taken with the P5.
Get the Rotel as it’s what you want, but the P5 really stands out in the American market at the 1100 price. I had the P7 and I hesitate to say that the P5 images better, but I will say I prefer it over the P7.