Lyra Delos A truth teller or what?

Actually what I have found with the Delos is it can be a little fussy with setup.  I settled on the stock headshell with the 1200g and lyra screws and nylon washers.  Sounds wonderful.  It does not sound overly pronounced in the upper mids anymore.  I was using the ortofon LH 6000 headshell and it seems pretty much made for the cadenza  cartridge.  maybe I will get one of those too.  I was having a hard time getting the right screw compliment for that headshell.  I was getting terrible resonances in the upper mids due to the screws not working in that headshell.  It sounds great on the 1200G stock headshell with boston audio design mat and Stillpoints LPI.  

I may try a Jelco (sumiko hs12 variant) as well

update: The longer i listen the more fatigue I get. I have tried the stock headshell, lh 6000 Ortofon, lh 4000 Ortofon. With each of the ortofons, I get terrible bass artifacts and when I use the stock headshell, that goes away but it is just too bright. I am thinking the Delos is a mistake with the 1200G table. It seems like the delos is a high energy cartridge that requires a very high mass arm to get the best out of it. think I will be selling it. Somebody will be getting a practically brand new cartridge for a lot less than retail. live and learn I guess. The headshells weigh almost 15 grams, 13 grams, and 7 grams. I doubt a 12 grams headshell will make much of a difference. I am wondering about the effective mass of the arm on the 1200g. they say 12 grams but I doubt it. I hooked up my scout with the Lyra and I did not get the resonance i did with the stock arm on the 1200G. I believe the effective mass of the 1200G is far less than 12 grams.

@tzh21y But not to worry, tomorrow it will be the best cartridge ever again.

Amusingly, the superiority of the SL1200 over a 6-figure t/t has been repeatedly touted in this thread with both tables bearing a cartridge not vastly dissimilar in spec to the Delos.

Go on. Blame the cartridge...  ;)