I'm not dreaming - these are great CD copies


I have an out of town friend who's given me some CD-Rs that he's made by simply copying music off of red book CDs. The music quality is extremely good - better than I'm used to hearing from my red book CDs. He's not an audiophile and has no idea what format is being utilized e.g. Lossless, etc.
Question - Can you really improve the quality of music from a red book CD by simply copying to some other format? If so, I'm boxing up all 300 of my CDs and asking my friend to copy make copies for me.
rockyboy
And yet the sound is better on the copy.
Sez you and the OP, I have never ever found this, always the original has sounded less in your face and more musical.

Cheers George 
In your face and musical are just words. They certainly don’t mean the same thing to everyone. I like things to be in your face if that’s how they’re supposed to sound. I don’t like laid back sound if it’s supposed to be more present and dynamic. It all depends. Furthermore just because you find something to be true, which maybe you did, maybe you didn’t, it doesn’t necessarily follow that it’s univerally true.
When ripping on a PC, the disk can be read as many times as necessary to get a parity match. If the disc surface has been abused, this could result in a more accurate file.

I've heard disks burned on the mastering converter, CD test pressings and the commercial release. All sound different. People on the other side of the planet noticed identical differences on home as opposed to reference quality equipment.

IMO, label paint is unscientifically applied and contributes to errors.

Some CDP benefit from a Discus or other damping atop the disc. Shock absorbtion is always a good idea for the player.

Computer burned discs may or may not match the ripped file depending on the quality of the writer. Almost assuredly, the burned disc will have a shorter life.

Ripped and burned discs sound 'different'. Better is in the ear of the beholder.
“IMO, label paint is unscientifically applied and contributes to errors.”

The colors of the label paint can influence the sound. Definitely. The paint might even contain ferrous materials though I’ve certainly never checked. It’s just a hunch. Why else would demagnetizing a CD influence the sound? Now, that I have checked.
This is very interesting indeed
I always wondered why a number of my burned discs sounded "better" than the originals?
But I do have to say not all, and now I think on, that could even be down to the blank used.
I did have a stack of Fuji and a stack of Maxwell that I used without paying any attention to which for what if you get my drift, were just blanks to me! 
Some of these have been burned a LONG time ago and are still playing strong.
Course hardly play any nowadays what with Tidal and my Vault containing all of my cds ripped to WAV files.......