2. cables
  3. 1445807411

why do people feel the need to buy expensive cable

I have tried expensive cables and one's moderately priced. I would say there were some differences but I can't actually say the expensive cables were better. IMHO I believe a lot of people buy expensive cables because they don't actual trust their ears and are afraid of making a mistake. They figure the expensive cables are better for the fact they cost more. If you have a difference of opinion or share the same thoughts, I would like to hear about it.
taters
Ag insider logo xs@2x
cleeds
5,768 posts
 
gdhal
It's obvious - to me anyway - you haven't understood my previous posts in this regard ...
Please feel free to correct me. My understanding is that you've proposed testing the audibility of wire directionality, but whenever anyone expresses interest in such a test, you direct the conversation offline. What part of that do I have wrong?
geoffkait's avatar
geoffkait
23,365 posts
 
Just as there was something wrong with the programming of the HAL 9000 computer, you could say it’s a glitch and I won’t mention exactly whose avatar HAL 9000 is.....Daisy, Daisy, give me your answer do, I’m half crazy all for the love of you....🎼

🤡

https://www.vintagecomputermusic.com/mp3/s2t9_Computer_Speech_Demonstration.mp3


gdhal's avatar
gdhal
1,641 posts
 
cleeds - Please feel free to correct me. My understanding is that you've proposed testing the audibility of wire directionality, but whenever anyone expresses interest in such a test, you direct the conversation offline. What part of that do I have wrong?

The part you have wrong is that I'm *NOT* proposing testing the audibility of wire directionality. I'm proposing *YOUR ABILITY TO HEAR IT* with the naked ear using mutually agreed objective testing. You know, like Amy and Bob.

"Hearing" is something that can only be accomplished offline, true?

Consider yourself "corrected".
gdhal's avatar
gdhal
1,641 posts
 
geoffkait - Just as there was something wrong with the programming of the HAL 9000 computer.....
Point well taken Geoff. And yes, the avatar is that of the HAL 9000. I never said, implied, or wrote there isn't anything "wrong" with me  though. In fact, if you search the forum, you can easily find that I've stated "I’m proud to be in the minority". But among the things I know are "right", are the inability for humans to do the impossible. And the impossible includes hearing a difference when ordinary speaker wire is reversed. 
Ag insider logo xs@2x
cleeds
5,768 posts
 
gdhal
I'm *NOT* proposing testing the audibility of wire directionality.  I'm proposing *YOUR ABILITY TO HEAR IT* with the naked ear using mutually agreed objective testing ..."Hearing" is something that can only be accomplished offline, true?
It sounds like we're talking about the same thing here, so let's discuss what would constitute a valid objective test. There's no reason to discuss that in secret, is there?

I'm not sure what you mean by "the naked ear." Is that supposed to be amusing, or do you mean you'd not allow use of headphones for your listening test? Using headphones in tests such as this can eliminate some variables and be very useful, and would certainly be my preference here.

As for the test itself - perhaps that's something that could be done in public, such as at a dealer, or audio society meeting. We could resolve those details later, after we've designed the test first.

Meanwhile, I hope you find a way to fix that CAPS LOCK key..

 
More to discover