You gotta be thinkin’, gee, I must be in deep kimchi if roberjerman is a fan.
Beware the audio guru
There are a few contributors to these forums who apparently see themselves as gurus. They speak in absolutes, using words such as "always" and "never." They make pronouncements about products or techniques they’ve never heard or experienced, justifying their conclusions because contrary claims are "impossible" or "snake oil." Those who disagree are accused of being "deluded," or suffering some insurmountable bias, or attempting to further some commercial agenda. On occasion, they have taunted detractors with an appeal that they engage in a wager - one guy wanted $25,000 cash up front and an agreement drafted by lawyers. Another offered 5-to-1 odds.
I am not going to tell you who to believe. But for anyone who might be uncertain about sorting out conflicting claims here, I suggest they consider the behavior of experts in other fields. No good doctor offers a 100 percent guarantee on any treatment or surgical procedure, even if medical science suggests success. No good attorney will tell you that you have a case that positively can’t be lost, even if the law appears to be on your side. No true professional will insult you for the questions you ask, or abandon you if you seek a second opinion.
A doctor conducts his own tests. An engineer makes his own measurements. Neither will insist the burden of documentation falls upon you.
These might be details to consider as you sift through the many conflicting claims made on Audiogon. In short: Decide for yourself. Don’t let other people tell you how to think, or listen.
I am not going to tell you who to believe. But for anyone who might be uncertain about sorting out conflicting claims here, I suggest they consider the behavior of experts in other fields. No good doctor offers a 100 percent guarantee on any treatment or surgical procedure, even if medical science suggests success. No good attorney will tell you that you have a case that positively can’t be lost, even if the law appears to be on your side. No true professional will insult you for the questions you ask, or abandon you if you seek a second opinion.
A doctor conducts his own tests. An engineer makes his own measurements. Neither will insist the burden of documentation falls upon you.
These might be details to consider as you sift through the many conflicting claims made on Audiogon. In short: Decide for yourself. Don’t let other people tell you how to think, or listen.
- ...
- 186 posts total
As well, we’re always getting into new points of understanding, every day. This just in... in the neuroscience of Human hearing. Science marches on: http://kavliprize.org/prizes-and-laureates/prizes/2018-kavli-prize-neuroscience It’s difficult to be a guru when the ground keeps changing. |
Don’t take this the wrong way but I find all that talk of “how hearing works” from the neuroscience point of view, the sound waves interacting with the ear and the brain actually quite mundane. The work by Rupert Sheldrake, by contrast, in behavior of animals and other living things, how memory works and Mind-Matter interaction and related topics, is not only more interesting but more relevant to the audio hobby. Not to mention the Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research PEAR group. And the work of Peter Belt specifically with the perception of sound. In other words, I think it’s a serious mistake to reduce perception, including the perception of hearing to a physical level, no matter how you wish to describe that physical level. “The acoustic waves impinge on inner ear and the neurons transmit the information to the brain.” Give me a break! I think it’s an indication just how conservative audiophiles really are. |
- 186 posts total