akg_ca: I am in agreement that feedback is essential when considering trusting a seller and I've passed on many items because of poor feedback. But I very much differ with you on your first point. You mention the PITA factor for opening a stored item. Yes, it can be a hassle but, isn't it necessary to know if the item is fully functional? Can you know this if the item has been in storage for any amount of time? And what would the nonrefundable deposit be for that you mention? As I indicated at the beginning of this post, if a seller clearly states the item is "untested" and/or "sold as-is" then the buyer should accept that.
But if a seller wants hundreds or thousands of my hard-earned dollars, then I unhesitatingly believe opening a box is justified and not at all whining. That seems common sense. Of course, since paypal almost always favors the buyer, I could just make the purchase and, if at all disappointed, send it back on the seller's dime (COD) and let paypal refund my purchase. But I'm not that kind of jerk and that's the whole point of this post. And it seems most agree. I find that reassuring and thank all who responded.
Lyle
But if a seller wants hundreds or thousands of my hard-earned dollars, then I unhesitatingly believe opening a box is justified and not at all whining. That seems common sense. Of course, since paypal almost always favors the buyer, I could just make the purchase and, if at all disappointed, send it back on the seller's dime (COD) and let paypal refund my purchase. But I'm not that kind of jerk and that's the whole point of this post. And it seems most agree. I find that reassuring and thank all who responded.
Lyle