thecarpathian,
Yup, that is what I found, too. Not much I could find about actual tuning and what to do about it, but it was interesting nevertheless. I am glad I was directed there. It could not be used for audio-topic, but in sociology and a few more branches of behavioral science, it would be good for a thesis or two. That is what my "interesting" referred to. A whole new world I was unaware existed. Almost giving up on gaining any more knowledge about actual music reproduction, I read with real interest. What I find either strange or, if it is all real, disturbing is the fact that most non-MG posts are written in the same manner. As if it was only one person writing them. It is probably not true, but having only one-minded crowd around rarely brings any progress. And to be that similar? As jf47t once mentioned in his reply to me....scary. Unless it is really only one person writing. Then it would be a mix of baffling and sad.
On the positive side, Michael Green that I know from this thread here comes across as less of a religious figure and more of a person you/I/anyone can agree or disagree with and imagine meeting in real life. In other words, more down to this planet. I have had no complaints about him here, despite some disagreements. In fact, I think he is an asset. I wish he visited more often. He does make me think and consider things from angles I am not used to.
Yup, that is what I found, too. Not much I could find about actual tuning and what to do about it, but it was interesting nevertheless. I am glad I was directed there. It could not be used for audio-topic, but in sociology and a few more branches of behavioral science, it would be good for a thesis or two. That is what my "interesting" referred to. A whole new world I was unaware existed. Almost giving up on gaining any more knowledge about actual music reproduction, I read with real interest. What I find either strange or, if it is all real, disturbing is the fact that most non-MG posts are written in the same manner. As if it was only one person writing them. It is probably not true, but having only one-minded crowd around rarely brings any progress. And to be that similar? As jf47t once mentioned in his reply to me....scary. Unless it is really only one person writing. Then it would be a mix of baffling and sad.
On the positive side, Michael Green that I know from this thread here comes across as less of a religious figure and more of a person you/I/anyone can agree or disagree with and imagine meeting in real life. In other words, more down to this planet. I have had no complaints about him here, despite some disagreements. In fact, I think he is an asset. I wish he visited more often. He does make me think and consider things from angles I am not used to.