Krell KSA100 vs Threshold 400A vs McCormack DNA 0.5


HiI need a 100W amplifier to drive my Morrison speakers. I Can easily refurbish electronics if needed. Someone offered me a Krell KSA100 another one offered me a Threshold 400A I have to repair and finally a McCormack DNA 0.5 or 1 seems appealing but I dont have any I could  buy.  I hate over detailed sound and I love tube amps mids but do'n want a tube amp. As I couldn't buy a Morrison woofer if I burn it with a faulty amp. I need something bullproof. I never heard and couldn't hear any amps mentionned with my setup.  What would be your preference or do you have any other recommendations ?
Thanks
legarem
@Aux - very considerate observation on behalf of the OP; this forum needs more people like you. I have to agree about detail in the McCormack DNA. I describe it as clear because "overly-detailed" seems such a derogatory term for an amp design that has received two decades of praise. 
To clarify...

The SMcAudio upgraded DNA amps have a wonderful textural smoothness and treble sweetnesss.  The greatest transformation is probably the huge soundstage.  @4hannons  Bingo on "clear".  The modded amps allow you to "see" deep into the soundstage.👂
Not familiar with ( have not heard ) Morrison speakers, but why not give the Nuforce STA 200 a try. $499. from Audio Advisor, and can be returned if you do not like it. I like it very much, and feel it is a "sleeper ". I do feel it betters many amps spoken about above. I am thinking of getting another one for a 2nd system. Research it though as it has some peculiarities about it. Enjoy ! MrD.
I've owned plenty of McCormack products (several of his preamps and still have two modded amps).  I've had multiple rounds of mods over the years, so I'm intimately aware of the performance from stock to various levels of mods in history up to as recent as 2 months ago (the last time I got an amp modded with the latest and greatest including some things he did for the first time on my model).  I also own ARC, McIntosh, Emotiva, digital amps, and many others over the years.

In terms of which one of the three above to buy, it's pretty much a no brainer.  In stock form, they are all long in the tooth and not going to be super reliable nor up-to-date.  If you don't want a tube amp, an old Class A isn't going to be much better in terms of heat issues. Plus, it's going to be less reliable.  The board is probably warping with all the heat/cooling over the years among other issues that I wouldn't want to deal with.

The only one you can get upgraded to be 100% reliable and warrantied is the McCormack. Plus, it's the only one you can get modded to state-of-the-art modern day performance customized for your speakers.  Part of the modifications that Steve does is tailor the voicing to your other equipment/listening tastes/etc.  You will never have to buy another amp again because you can always send it back for new mods like I have for like 20 years now.  It's night and day from stock form and my amp now makes the internals of the $55k Dagostinos look like a toy for a fraction of the cost.

One thing that people also don't realize is that you can modify the "looks" too.  I've never personally invested in modding the looks, but my friend has Ayon tube monoblocks that look great, so he wanted his modded McCormack to be aesthetically in a similar league.  As a result, they are doing some custom work on that end too.

In legacy stock form, I would agree/disagree with what's been said above.  It's probably not the amp for those that like "tube" sound. . However, it's not because of it's interface with speakers.  It's more about the source feeding it.  (BTW, in full-monty modded form, it's better than my ARC Reference amps)

In stock form, it was built to a modest budget level and delivered a surprisingly high ceiling performance, but building an amp to a modest budget is also a kiss of death.  Many people will mate a modest budget amp with a modest budget source that may not have the same performance ceiling.  (MFGs have figured this out and that's why prices are so ridiculous nowadays.  They stick a high price tag on their products, so you and reviewers will mate it with theoretically other high price/high performance gear and not feed it junk.)  Modest gear that performs on the same level as high priced gear often gets shafted and false reputations because it gets paired with lesser quality sources.  Krell and Threshold were far more expensive back in the day, so much of their reputation compared to McCormack is based on being also paired with higher level of sources in most people's systems.

Just to be clear though with my recommendation.  It's a "no-brainer" assuming you are getting it modded.  As good as it was in stock form, the McCormack is past it's useful life and all the driver boards need to be replaced at this stage of it's life cycle.  If you are looking at those 3 options for use in used stock form, I say the "no brainer" answer is to buy NONE of them.  Get a much more current used amp or something new from quality budget suppliers like Emotiva, Parasound, etc.

Good luck.
@labtec  +1!  Everything you said about what Steve McCormack can do for you is accurate.  If you decide to modify an "older" McC. amp. they send you a questionnaire about your system and listening preferences so they can tailor their modifications to your amp to optimize its performance with your speakers and associated gear.  Extremely reasonable price for the depth of the modifications.