I laugh when reading threads like this. It's as though there is an absolute or holy grail. All materials have different properties. All speakers have compromises.
Designers figure out what they want for their sound and build/design accordingly. They do a ton of R&D if they are large enough and will use all different materials. They can do modeling and figure out most of it on a computer. I think this is one reason the DIY groups started to grow again after they were kind of losing steam a bit in the early 2000's based only on what I've been told (I may be wrong).
Folks will find fault with all speakers. We all hear differently. I'm glad that folks who have Magico's love them, but to many they do ring and are fatiguing. I feel that Wilson's and their polymers and choice of drivers lose much of the micro and macro details, but boy are they dynamic. I love listening to Harbeths, but again, they too lack much detail, but man are they enjoyable. All use different cabinet materials.
I own Vandersteen's and I choice them over nearly everything I could possibly audition that was under 35k or so. He went the carbon fiber way years ago from house made cones to the cabinet. I also know that he 'auditioned' all the different weaves of carbon fiber that he could get and choice a specific on based on it's sound quality. It's a very expensive cloth as it's teh same one used in my ultra high end walking poles (I have MS and have poles to get around inside buildings when I can't use my rollator).
the bottom line is that some will find fault wiht the sound of the Vandersteen 7's as they will focus on his compromises, just like I get fatigued listening to Magico's as he's lifted the treble to make them sound more open on top etc... (if you measure speakers, many of them are lifted up to 3db in the high end to give them a more 'detailed and or larger soundstage".)
Again, it's all implementation and compromises. There is personal preference, which makes this hobby a blast, but no 1 correct answer.
Designers figure out what they want for their sound and build/design accordingly. They do a ton of R&D if they are large enough and will use all different materials. They can do modeling and figure out most of it on a computer. I think this is one reason the DIY groups started to grow again after they were kind of losing steam a bit in the early 2000's based only on what I've been told (I may be wrong).
Folks will find fault with all speakers. We all hear differently. I'm glad that folks who have Magico's love them, but to many they do ring and are fatiguing. I feel that Wilson's and their polymers and choice of drivers lose much of the micro and macro details, but boy are they dynamic. I love listening to Harbeths, but again, they too lack much detail, but man are they enjoyable. All use different cabinet materials.
I own Vandersteen's and I choice them over nearly everything I could possibly audition that was under 35k or so. He went the carbon fiber way years ago from house made cones to the cabinet. I also know that he 'auditioned' all the different weaves of carbon fiber that he could get and choice a specific on based on it's sound quality. It's a very expensive cloth as it's teh same one used in my ultra high end walking poles (I have MS and have poles to get around inside buildings when I can't use my rollator).
the bottom line is that some will find fault wiht the sound of the Vandersteen 7's as they will focus on his compromises, just like I get fatigued listening to Magico's as he's lifted the treble to make them sound more open on top etc... (if you measure speakers, many of them are lifted up to 3db in the high end to give them a more 'detailed and or larger soundstage".)
Again, it's all implementation and compromises. There is personal preference, which makes this hobby a blast, but no 1 correct answer.