Ohm Walsh Micro Talls: who's actually heard 'em?

I have my own minor update. My wife just spoke to me about my pending speaker decision, and asked me if I'd made my mind up yet- the Talls or the 100's. After describing what I know about both, she thinks the 100's are a 'no-brainer'.
Now I just need to pay off a couple more bills, save a few more pennies and commit. Hopefully a couple more months. In the meantime, I seem to have acquired some WAF, a very rare thing indeed...

Parasound63,

Great news. The WAF of the 100's should be pretty good. At least my wife hasn't complained about them! Not the most gorgeous hunk of audio equipment you've ever seen, but hardly as overwhelming and hideous as some of what's out there! :-)

Thanks Rebbi!

So- any thoughts on the 100's vs. the MWT's? I think the Talls would work for me best in nearfield listening- but I personally have a hard time letting go of the deeper bass that I understand the 100's deliver.

Parasound,

I plan to have a post up by the end of the week, now that my dad is out of the woods with his surgery. I need to soon reclaim some space in the house and so either the MWT's or the 100's will be shipped back to Ohm soon. I'm hoping to do some head-to-head listening on Wednesday/Thursday, so expect a post by the weekend or sooner.

Ok Rebbi and fellow posters-

I'm feeling Ohm-sick.

I just sold my Definitive BP-2006TL theater package to a grateful buyer and am using my old Pinnacle Classic Gold References. I have a little cash towards my purchase.

But I keep going back-and-forth on the MWT's or the 100-S-3's. If I got with the MWT's, I can probably purchase in the next 2 weeks. If I hold out for the 100's, it could be 2 months.

Any guidance out there?