Doug Schroeder Method, Double ic

If anyone is familiar with Morrow Audio cables, he adds more runs of his special wire to achieve higher resolution, etc., as the price goes up. I have a pair of MA3 with 12 runs of wire and a pair of MA5 with 36 runs of wire. The MA5s are quite a bit better in every category of music and sound. Is this a similar thing to what is being discussed here ? Thx, Enjoy ! MrD.

@mrdecibel I think the MA assemblies with the SSI tech wires are “conventional” in nature (think Canare Starquad but only at a much higher level with respect to one type of conductor). 

Conventional aspects also play in, if you calculate it out, the core waveguide material vs surrounding field space is not a linear equation ---as one adds conductors. WRT to how the physics of complex electrical function deals with it, that is.

Sadly, it’s not that simple either... as the rest of the complexities can and does create exceptions to that rule unless the experiment is tightly controlled and delinted well enough. Ye olde "resolution and quality of the answer can only equal the definition and quality of the question" - kinda thing

Has anyone else taken upon themselves the do at your own risk adventure of the Schroeder Method interconnects? I know of at least one person who was using it since my article first appeared and is pleased. 

What XLR splitters are being used?

I have three possibilities, and I’m not sure any of them qualify for even testing:
- Oppo 205 with a balanced output (mod) to a Directstream dac
- DS dac to ATC active speakers (SCM19A)
- alternatively, DS dac RCA out to JL Audio subs (active) and, with an adapter, XLR from the subs to the ATC actives

I'm not picturing what "outer" and "inner" mean in referring to the final half twist on each end, since which cable plugs into which splitter lead would depend on how the end plugged into the component. Twisting the latter the other way would seem meaningless.