Musiclink cables sound better reversed

I believe that the shield inside the cable is attached to ground only on one end, that being the end the arrow points to. When you reverse direction with signal flow going opposite of arrows your only changing witch component (sending or receiving) has the grounded shield end attached to it.Should not be a problem for your equipment, if it sounds better and no hum or other undesirable issues go for it!I use my interconnects for my phono stage with signal flow opposite of the arrows and the sound is much clearer and leaner, and in this case is exactly what is needed, big improvement.
Gary

It depends on which is more important sonically, the shielding or the wire directionality. Assuming the interconnects are shielded. Some interconnects with arrows are unshielded.

Thanks everyone. Maritime, right now I have the Rotel RC-1580 preamp and the RB-1590 amp. I had the RB-1075. I don't think I have the experience to compare the RB-1590 amp to other higher-end amps. But I think I know good, clean, fast sound. I am very picky about how music should sound out of my B&W 804S speakers. The 1590 amp has been a big improvement, especially in bass response, depth and speed and a complete absence of audible signs of distortion at any level I care to listen to.  It actually gives the 804s a little of a workout for a change.  It has oodles of headroom, and I really like its transparency. I dont like warm sounding systems, but I do like range and linearity, and I feel I get that from my system so far. I would love some preamp recommendations, as that is probably next.

All my reference CDs sounded better last night with the Musiclinks reversed than with any of my other cables. In the “right” direction, bass drums sounded like someone plunking on a watermelon, and the mids and highs sounded compressed and muffled. I would say the Musiclinks added just a tad more warmth than my Audioquest cables, in the “wrong” direction that is. But it was just the right amount of warmth in a system that is not that warm to begin with, and the mids and highs were just as clear and airy as with the Audioquest.

I can compare the RB-1590 to the NAD M25, which I tried at home before returning it for the Rotel. I used four of its channels to biamp my B&Ws. To me at least, the M25 sounded really good, but I missed the airy highs of my old Rotel 1075. To me, the M25 just sounded too sterile and not exciting enough. When I hooked up the Rotel RB-1590 after hearing the M25, I found what I felt was missing in the M25. It was much more exciting and complex listening. Voices sounded more like voices and all sounds seemed to have more range and complexity, with equal clarity and way more powerful and even faster bass, at least on my speakers.
I dont know if this makes sense. But to me it was like the difference between a quality CD sound from the NAD and a quality vinyl sound from the Rotel.