@glupson, audiopoint was referring to my August 27th, 3:01 PM post on this page.
Talk but not walk?
Hi Guys
This isn't meant to start a fight, but it is important to on lookers. As a qualifier, I have my own audio forum where we report on audio issues as we empirically test them. It helps us short cut on theories and developing methods of listening. We have a wide range of systems and they are all over the world adding their experiences to the mix. Some are engineers, some are artist and others are audiophiles both new and old. One question I am almost always asked while I am visiting other forums, from some of my members and also members of the forum I am visiting is, why do so many HEA hobbyist talk theory without any, or very limited, empirical testing or experience?
I have been around empirical testing labs since I was a kid, and one thing that is certain is, you can always tell if someone is talking without walking. Right now on this forum there are easily 20 threads going on where folks are talking theory and there is absolutely no doubt to any of us who have actually done the testing needed, that the guy talking has never done the actual empirical testing themselves. I've seen this happen with HEA reviewers and designers and a ton of hobbyist. My question is this, why?
You would think that this hobby would be about listening and experience, so why are there so many myths created and why, in this hobby in particular, do people claim they know something without ever experimenting or being part of a team of empirical science folks. It's not that hard to setup a real empirical testing ground, so why don't we see this happen?
I'm not asking for peoples credentials, and I'm not asking to be trolled, I'm simply asking why talk and not walk? In many ways HEA is on pause while the rest of audio innovation is moving forward. I'm also not asking you guys to defend HEA, we've all heard it been there done it. What I'm asking is a very simple question in a hobby that is suppose to be based on "doing", why fake it?
thanks, be polite
Michael Green
www.michaelgreenaudio.net
- ...
- 2164 posts total
| Post removed |
You know at this "point" I really don’t mind Bobby’s and Tom’s rants, because like the posters are "pointing" out this is great free advertising for Michael Green Audio’s Cones and Michael Green Audio as a whole and Tuning in general. Thank you readers! Also thank you Audiogon for keeping such a close eye on the posts that go over the top. I also am glad I presented this OP the way I did cause all of us can enjoy the OP play out in real time. Elizabeth said "If it’s a BATTLE.. I’ll throw in my footers, and compare them to any...Butyl rubber size 10 chemical bottle stoppers. my response Come right on in!!! I don’t think anyone should be excluded from the fun of "Walking" this hobby. You know how many footer type products are out there now? It’s staggering to think how the market grew after Steve came out with his Tip Toe. I don’t know if you guys remember, but back in the day when I came out with my RoomTune Racks, Cones, Cable Grounds and of course RoomTune there were (still are) a few very innovative companies who knew the future and developed a way to bring these products to the public. The Cable Company is one, Audio Advisor, I think later Music Direct and a few others that were key in making accessories part of the big picture. I had a client here today and after listening a while he said "what do you think about the internet?" We talked about how everything HEA changed after the internet came along, in a positive way. This thread and Audiogon forum is a great example, and I think it will only get better as time goes on. As the listener continues to progress Tuning will become the biggest part of the hobby. The words "Tuning" and "Playing" are the most important action words in all of music. To play with any accuracy you must Tune. Stereophile in one of it’s categories calls the art of acoustics "Room Tuning". They don’t call it Room Dampening or Room Diffusing they call it "Room Tuning". All of these debates and product showdowns and folks trying to flex their theory muscles is interesting but say the words "Tuning" or "Playing" your system and the world of music from a practical sense is now in business. That’s pretty darn cool. So I say again come one come all, Lets Walk! Lets do some Tuning! Michael Green http://www.michaelgreenaudio.net/ |
| Post removed |
bdp24, I got it. For some reason, I missed it before despite carefully looking for it twice. Well, what can I say in my defense? Nothing. I agree with your general idea, but it is from the viewpoint of "music is the reason" while I have a feeling that many people are really in it to play with their toys. The music becomes an excuse. I see it as LEGO for adults, in some way. It just happens to be with equipment that reproduces sounds, but it could be anything else. The goal is to play with it and not necessarily to play it. I think those are two different groups of owners of a little bit pricier/more sophisticated equipment. One that buys it because it simply sounds better while they play music and the other one that is in it for building, rebuilding, outsmarting other hobbyists (just look at this thread), etc. I feel that many people from the second group convinced themselves that they are in it for music, while they really enjoy the "construction" part of their activity. Look at this thread, or many others for that matter, and you will see how much time and effort people put in chasing something by trying new things. For example, I was really curious what "tuning" would encompass. I came out with a conclusion that it is a fluid process that, if you believed in it, you would have to do, more or less, every day. That would require focus on what has been achieved with certain move and then waiting for it to "settle"/"burn in"/whatever else. From what I gathered, the time would be dedicated to changing/improving sound which just seems too much work and too little play to me. I tend to turn the equipment on and leave it playing until I go to sleep. Building was just to get to the point when sound is satisfactory enough not to ask for more tinkering. It could be better, but what the heck. I have no time for listening carefully for a week to figure out if some compound placed on top of my amplifier would change the sound for better. In fact, now when I think about it, it would probably obstruct the airflow and first page of instructions says not to do so. You seem to fall into the first of my two groups. People who have a system to listen to music on. It is not a hobby, I agree. Other group is not less valid and, I think, they are just as happy with their game. It is a hobby and it happens to use same tools as yours and mine. |
- 2164 posts total