2. amps-preamps
  3. 137918-20253

The Truth about Modern Class D

All my amps right now are Class D. ICEpower in the living room, and NAD D 3020 in the bedroom.

I’ve had several audiophiles come to my home and not one has ever said "Oh, that sounds like Class D."

Having said this, if I could afford them AND had the room, I’d be tempted to switch for a pair of Ayre monoblocks or Conrad Johnson Premiere 12s and very little else.

I’m not religious about Class D. They sound great for me, low power, easy to hide, but if a lot of cash and the need to upgrade ever hits me, I could be persuaded.

The point: Good modern Class D amps just sound like really good amplifiers, with the usual speaker/source matching issues.

You don’t have to go that route, but it’s time we shrugged off the myths and descriptions of Class D that come right out of the 1980’s.
erik_squires
georgehifi's avatar
georgehifi
10,312 posts
 
because even though you don’t like Class D you are in every single discussion about it.
Sorry didn’t know it was a closed shop, and only one sided opinions were allowed!

"Why I can’t move past 30 year old arguments."
Because they still apply today, but there’s light on the horizon. Just because you can’t hear the problems, doesn’t mean others can’t. As posted here already by others to your chagrin. 
auxinput
2,921 posts
 
So, to sum it up,   Class D - you either like it or you don't.  No middle ground here.
kedoades
251 posts
 
   I love my cherry plus amp from digital amp company.  Is it the best?  No,  but for the money it is very very good
ieales's avatar
ieales
1,201 posts
 
When, oh when, will people stop commenting on components and wake up to the fact we are building systems?

Take a speaker with slightly soft top end and marry to a slightly zippy amplifier and the combination could be closer to the ever unattainable perfection.

Equipment reviews are sometimes are funnier than the comics!
helomech
1,850 posts
 
Vladimir Shushurin (Lamm)
"No, it is not. And I would like to respond to the second part of this question with an allegory. Any field of human activity defines a number of requirements which, when properly implemented, guarantee a positive outcome.
For example, the basic requirement in the army and sports is an able-bodied individual. So, it would be quite natural to concentrate on searching for such an individual (especially as we know where to find him).
However, out of the blue we decide to choose a feeble-bodied person who, on top of that, is encumbered by various diseases. Having made this decision (which is a priori improper) we start justifying it to ourselves and others by citing the great state of our medicine, which is capable of curing many ailments."

Bingo
More to discover