2. speakers
  3. 137420-84310

Green Mountain Audio Chroma HX Review

I just had my Green Mountain Audio Chromas upgraded to Chroma HX. The difference is the crossover, with the capacitors being exceptionally high-grade. The low-pass filter is specially made to Roy Johnson's specifications. Unobtainium (not for sale) Litz wire is used with the latest unobtainium solder. The change is dramatic enough to consider the HX a different speaker, even though the schematic is essentially the same.

And the result is absolutely stunning. I was expecting a substantial improvement, but I was unprepared for the result. It's going to be difficult to put this into words, but I'm going to try. Let's face, we've heard it all before.

I have never heard a speaker that so effortlessly plays music. Every note has more music in it. I guess you could call that greater detail, but the HX transcends that description. Perhaps I should call it harmonic richness. The sound is unbelievably accurate, yet musical, throughout the frequency spectrum. The copious bass digs down deeper while being more well-defined. I would call it high-definition bass, to coin a term. The midrange is similarly tuneful, clear and also hi-def. It just flows naturally and cleanly. I would describe the treble as ethereal, sparkly and airy, never bright.

The HX is also the most coherent speaker I have ever heard. The woofer and the tweeter coexist happily. It is impossible to tell where the crossover frequencies are. You cannot hear the port either, just the bass. I find myself listening for hours, without fatigue, because the music captures my attention and holds it.

The sheer accuracy seems to lend itself to the soundstage, imaging with pinpoint precision. You know where every voice and instrument is at all times. This is an area of audio that I didn't much care about previously, but I cannot ignore now.

Any criticisms? Well one, maybe. If you like to crank the bass hard enough to drive your neighbors to yell death threats, you're going to need a powered sub.

I have heard many speakers in my time, among them Wilson Audio, Joseph Audio, Paradigm, Triangle, Meadowlark, Dali, Thiel, Usher and Vandersteen. None of them can deliver what the HX can. It's not even close. If you have a pair of the already excellent Chromas, HXing them is a must. I have found the speakers that I am going keep for life in the Chroma HX.

Related equipment:
Musical Fidelity A308cr with upgraded clocks
Audio Note Kits DAC 2.1
Pass Labs B1 buffered passive pre modified for shunt volume control
Pass Labs Aleph 3 power amp
BPT BP-1 balanced power conditioner
Audio Magic Matrix Mini power conditioner
Pass Labs Aleph 3 power amp


dave122
audiokinesis
2,747 posts
 

@kenjit : "I think they are reasonable questions which require answers."

You clearly have an agenda. Let it go.

Kenjit: "Like what?"

The kinds of measurements and analysis he conducts, and the time coherent results he gets. Imo the things he can do well are a lot more difficult than the things I can (hopefully) do well.

Duke

kenjit
1,771 posts
 
There were no measurements. He just stuck a 0.21mh coil on the woofer and called it a day. No baffle step, nothing.
The baffle is so heavily slanted that you're never on axis unless you stand up. All in the name of time coherence and all at the expense of a smooth polar response. Which by the way you'd never get out of a cabinet the shape of the chroma. Olsen showed that a cylinder is the worst possible shape yet the eos is essentially a tweeter sat on top of the cabinet with no boundary other than its faceplate. Could have used a waveguide at least! 


mindlessminion
99 posts
 
If you were happy with the PMC speakers I recommend finding something with a like sound.  I have only heard PMC at shows and thought they were very good.  Perhaps the PMC twenty .24 or something in the twenty lineup is what you should strive for.

I was not suggesting your amp wasn't good, but merely curious what it was. a solid state amp with 100 watts of power vs a 8 watt tube amp does matter.  

I do find it somewhat odd that you haven't found a new set.  I couldn't live for 6 years without a decent set of speakers.
audiokinesis
2,747 posts
 

Kenjit: "There were no measurements. He just stuck a 0.21mh coil on the woofer and called it a day"

If Roy says he used measurements in the design process and you say he did not, guess who we’re going to believe?

Kenjit: "No baffle step, nothing."

I have not used baffle step compensation since I was an amateur.

Kenjit: "The baffle is so... All in the name... Which by the way you’d never... Olsen showed that... "

Since you know so much, why not design your own speakers?

And in the meantime, why not let it go? How is that going to harm you?

Duke

kenjit
1,771 posts
 


The kinds of measurements and analysis he conducts, and the time coherent results he gets. Imo the things he can do well are a lot more difficult than the
things I can (hopefully) do well.

99% of speaker companies don't care about time coherence. 99% Audiophiles don't either.

If it was so important, surely more people would pay attention to it?

If Roy says he used measurements in the design process and you say he did not, guess who we’re going to believe?

Hopefully you will believe neither of us and just do your own research to find out the facts. If you go online there are crossover calculators. Plug in 3khz 1st order, and you get 0.21mh on the 4ohm woofer which is the exact value used by green mountain. So no measurements were involved. 

I have not used baffle step compensation since I was an amateur.

I would love to hear your explanation for that.

And in the meantime, why not let it go? How is that going to harm you?
 I'm still waiting for somebody to answer the questions I've raised.
Why are you so eager to prevent a discussion? What harm is there?




More to discover