KEF blades 2 or Dynaudio C4?

I'm confused about the comment regarding KEF Muon being a copy of the Dynaudio C4. I just don't see any sort of resemblance. The Muon, introduced in 2008 is an all-aluminum cabinet shell with activated carbon damping material lining it. The Muon carries 4 front-firing and 2 rear-firing 10" low frequency drivers, 1 low-midrange 10", 5" upper midrange and one 1" aluminum tweeter. And it's a closed-box speaker.

The Dynaudio C4 is a conventional MDF, wood, and metal cabinet, has two 8" woofers, two 6" midrange, and twin 1-1/8" Esostar2 soft dome tweeters. It is a rear ported box. I'm not sure when it came out, but I doubt it was as far back as 2008.

Lastly, the list price on Muon is $220,000US, not $150,000US. These two speakers couldn't be more different in technology, drivers, cabinets, though they could potentially be priced further apart. ;)

@kot 

Bad move kot. Audiotroy or audioracle or whatever Audiogon moniker he’s using this week will be along soon to point out how wrong you are in this opinion. 

@audiotroy I bought 3 products from well known industry leading brands from Bill before he retired. This disputes your point above which is obviously exaggerated.

@pops ,
Well pops, long time. Nice to hear you’re still kicking it. 
Hope you’re well. 

Sorry Pops hate to disagree there is next to no evidence on the web to validate your claim even if Mr Feil shut down his bus three years ago there should be some proof of his store and brands.

Acoustic Zen and Atmosphere are decent products but market leaders they are not.

So Pops what did you get from Feil.

As per Blades being mediocre Kot 
The speakers have been rated Class A by Stereophile as well as most of the respected press.

And Yes Blades are better then Ref 3 and 5 we have all three loudspeakers on display.

Dave and Troy
Audio Doctor NJ