Thiel Owners


Guys-

I just scored a sweet pair of CS 2.4SE loudspeakers. Anyone else currently or previously owned this model?
Owners of the CS 2.4 or CS 2.7 are free to chime in as well. Thiel are excellent w/ both tubed or solid-state gear!

Keep me posted & Happy Listening!
128x128jafant
Yes, I would say the coax feed cap upgrade removes a slight coarse veil over the mid- upper frequencies. The MRA-12 Mills resistors add some ease. The drivers / cabinet have enough inherent quality to support considerably better XO parts. Keep up the good work.

Regarding wire. I suggest leaving it as is. Thiel pioneered great wire before wire was a thing. I believe I alluded some details in a previous post earlier this year. Summary is that Thiel hookup and coil wire is world-class and most attempted "upgrades" would in fact downgrade the wire. Our first wire in the late 70 resulted from cousin Teddy's recommendation for ITT aerospace 6-9s pure long crystal in teflon twisted 2/inch right-hand. ITT abandoned the wire business after aerospace contracted and similar wire is now made by others. Thiel wire is all certified at least 4-9s+ twisted in teflon. The coils are of the same wire and the gauges are optimized per use. Don't think that larger diameter, lower gauge coil wire is superior. It is not. The exception is late-stage 3.7 XOs from China with CYC caps which have Chinese wire that claims the same specs, but which can't be verified and industry insiders doubt its purity.

Our upcoming upgrades will add gauge to some input and driver runs, and replace series-feed coils with foil for extant wire. All certified 4-9s+ best-of-form. 
Thanks, Tom, for the explanation.  I think we hear the same things, but you know why whereas I just hear.  In any case, the 3.5's give me music .... I've mellowed in my old age.

BTW, I was part of a small group of audiophiles who formed a listening group for Jim once.  A mutual friend in Louisville where I was living at the time asked me to join in ..... he had a baronial place in the far suburbs beyond where I lived, and when I arrived the large living room was set up with an oracle turntable and Audio Research gear.  I believe the speakers may have been early prototype 3's (this was probably 1982).  In any case, the superior imaging and fulsom frequency respond were immediately apparent.  Once I got back home, the flaws in my own Audio Research gear driving IMF TLS-80's made itself known, although I kept them for another ten years.  Finally, after moving to Burlington, VT in 1989 I snagged a pair of 3.5's that served as dealer demo's.  Been happy ever since and later added the additional 3.5's and 2 2's for surround.
Tom, I was thinking to change the resistors for the Mundorf MResist Supreme one's, but will the MRA-12 Mills be the better choice? 

Like the pricing of the MRA's compared to the Mundorf's :-)

Br,  Mario
holco - beetlemania and I have combined our resistor inquiry and included some things I know about brands from history. We are convinced that the MRA-12s are our first choice. Part of that choice is their patented technologies and the Aryton-Perry non-inductive design, since I am paying particular attention to electromagnetic eddy currents. There are higher-tech resistors out there at multiples of the cost. My interest is in honest engineering-based solutions without cross-talk into sonic editorialism. Jeff at Sonic Craft and other knowledgeable operatives have been quite helpful in wading through the brands and claims and factors involved. You and all here are welcome to construct a comparative test for our collective learning.