My first Tube Amplifier

I have two speakers.

First one is Lansch 4.1 with 99db/w and second one is Vaughn  Cabernet speaker 93db/w.

Both have active woofers.

Lansche go down to 20Hz, Vaugn to 28hz.

I recommend Vaughn speaker to you for SET.

If you live close to Seattle, you are welcome to drop at my home for listen.

@bdp24 

Thanks, it is true that the more expensive amplifiers were pushed harder. As Brooks once said to me. Why should I sell a $5000 amplifier when i can sell a $20,000 one. You only get to sell one!

I never wanted to make expensive amplifiers, just fair priced, good sounding ones that don't break. We have 35 year old amps and preamps with original caps still sounding great. You dont need to recap our amps yet! You dont need fancy fuses that don't protect as I have written about the TuningFuses

Dynaco st-70. I thought I had a killer amp in my Adcom 555, back in the 90's. The Dynaco was bought just to see what the fuse was all about.  I loved reading Stereophile mag. At the time. I was hooked. From there I went to Quicksilver, Audio Research ,Cary, Mesa Baron,
SET 300B, 2A3, 45.
45 was the best. But I did not like having to use horns to get volume from it.
I have settled on El-34 based tube amps of 40-60 watts/channel, in order to use more "conventional" types of speakers. I am back to Quicksilver Audio.
They have a touch of SET magic, although they are push pull ultralinear. Mike Sanders is a genius.
If I had to go solid state, I can live with Pass Labs amps.

@ramtubes, Yep Roger, it was those expensive Jadis that my $20,000 price point was referring to. Brooks had them and the almost equally expensive VTL’s in his main room, driving (usually) Wilson speakers. The Jadis are beautiful to look at, have great fit & finish, and those massive transformers! But what is their price buying you, in terms of sound? Why is it a seriously flawed design (your example above) can find favor with some audiophiles? Are they listening with their eyes ;-) ? Or are such matters not what actually determines the sound (or lack thereof) of an amp? If an amp can have such an obvious shortcoming in it’s design, what does that say about the talent of it’s designer? And what other design flaws lie hidden within it’s beautiful exterior? John Atkinson’s reports often reveal them, but audiophiles don’t "believe" in bench test results, thanks to the writings of Harry Pearson and other purely-subjective reviewers. Harry also introduced the disgusting-to-me term of "High End" into perfectionist audio (J. Gordon Holt’s preferred term), leading to the belief that price equals performance. ’Taint necessarily so.