It is interesting indeed, halcro. I agree with you in your strong preference for the sound of analog vs digital. Â You seem to be particularly sensitive to high frequency aberrations and why you react so strongly to the sound of digital and perhaps why you prefer the sound of a good MM. Â I hear consistently less high frequency detail and sense of limitless extension with most MMâs compared to MCâs which often go too far in the other direction such as with the SPU Silver. Â I think noromanceâs description of MM/MCâs was in reference to the three cartridges in question only and not a generalization. Â I would never describe MCâs as a group to be more âlushâ than MMâs; quite the opposite. Â
To me ears it is MMâs that tend to have a fuller, more tonally saturated sound; what I would describe as âlushâ. Â I have also found that the sometimes exaggerated high frequency âclarityâ of some MCâs creates a better balance in my all-tube amplification chain which tends, itself, to be on the lush side. Â Even the best of my MMâs can be a little too lush and dark in my system without enough clarity and control in the highs. Â The problem for me is that while I love the midrange âneutralityâ of good MMâs they tend to go a little too far in that direction; almost as if they rob timbres of some natural colors by seeming to reduce the high frequency extension needed to balance out the very full and dense midrange character. Â MCâs tend to put the emphasis on clarity/detail in the highs leaving the midrange to sound too lean. Â A very difficult balance to get right. Â
Assessing dynamics is complicated since timbre neutrality affects our perception of it. Â All I can say is that to me that wonderful âcoiled springâ aliveness and sense of the music always moving forward is generally better served by good MCâs. Â Not that MMâs donât do it well; matter of degeee. Â I commented on the ET2 thread a while ago on a MM that I felt was the best MM that I have owned in regard to dynamics as described above. Â The Acutex M420 STR. Â Do you happen to have this cartridge? Â Would love to hear it up against some of your faves.
Thanks!Â
To me ears it is MMâs that tend to have a fuller, more tonally saturated sound; what I would describe as âlushâ. Â I have also found that the sometimes exaggerated high frequency âclarityâ of some MCâs creates a better balance in my all-tube amplification chain which tends, itself, to be on the lush side. Â Even the best of my MMâs can be a little too lush and dark in my system without enough clarity and control in the highs. Â The problem for me is that while I love the midrange âneutralityâ of good MMâs they tend to go a little too far in that direction; almost as if they rob timbres of some natural colors by seeming to reduce the high frequency extension needed to balance out the very full and dense midrange character. Â MCâs tend to put the emphasis on clarity/detail in the highs leaving the midrange to sound too lean. Â A very difficult balance to get right. Â
Assessing dynamics is complicated since timbre neutrality affects our perception of it. Â All I can say is that to me that wonderful âcoiled springâ aliveness and sense of the music always moving forward is generally better served by good MCâs. Â Not that MMâs donât do it well; matter of degeee. Â I commented on the ET2 thread a while ago on a MM that I felt was the best MM that I have owned in regard to dynamics as described above. Â The Acutex M420 STR. Â Do you happen to have this cartridge? Â Would love to hear it up against some of your faves.
Thanks!Â