The Future of Audio Amplification


I have recently paired an Audio Research DS225 Class D amplifier with an Audio Research tube preamplifier (SP8 mkii). I cannot believe how wonderful and lifelike my music sounds. The DS225 replaced an Audio Research SD135 Class AB amplifier. Perhaps the SD135 is just not as good as some of the better quality amps that are out there, but it got me thinking that amazingly wonderful sonance can be achieved with a tubed pre and Class D amp. I have a hunch that as more people experience this combination, it will likely catch on and become the future path of many, if not most audiophile systems. It is interesting that Audio Research has been at the forefront of this development.
distortions
" Where are we at with class D right now? Everyone keeps saying that the future is class D but where is that in the future?"
I do too, and it will come, when they've got it all right, with no compromises. 
When they get rid of it's "flaws".

Every detractor of Class-D never complains about it's bass or upper bass or even lower mids, it's always about the upper mids and highs.

Technics with their  $20k  SE-R1 have broken the Class-D norm and got most of the way to fixing these "flaws", by using a switching frequency at twice the norm, instead of around 600khz they've gone with very special GAN components to double the switching frequency to 1.5mhz, (3mhz would be better) this then allows the low order switching noise output filter to do it's job completely without leaving any effects and any left over switching noise artifacts within the audio band. 

Cheers George
kosst_amojan
no class D amp will ever compete with a class A amp.  It's simply impossible to build a class D amp that reaches out to 500,000Hz and doesn't burp driving DC into a 2 ohm load.
This is the logical fallacy of the "excluded middle." Audio amplifiers aren't required to deliver DC. Even many excellent conventional amplifiers would fail to meet this absurd, arbitrary spec.
George
I have looked over that Technics technology and hope that it may trickle down into more affordable components as right now 20k is a very hard sell to non believers.

Hopefully somebody can make it happen for a lot less dollar!

This type of argument comes up quite often.  Class D vs A, AB,or Digital vs analog, or different speakers, amps, etc.

people have their opinions and there is nothing wrong with having an educated opinion.  having an opinion with know what one is talking about is quite another thing.

I haven't seen one really wrong thing on the posts here.  people just have opinions.  Some based on equipment that they have heard and others on their past experiences.

Class D has been around for quite some time.  In car audio it was really the only way to go to get the power output needed.  you can't do it from 12 VDC.  So switching power supplies were mandatory, and there was/is/are some quite good car audio amps out there. 

Home audio was quite another thing.  switching noise was a serious problem.  Finding output devices that could handle the high frequency switching with low/no noise was hard and people could hear it.

Now, Class D has for home audio has come a long way.  No way Jeff Rowland would delve into Class D if he couldn't do it right.  I spoke with Jeff Rowland at the 2018 RMAF about this and he told me that they will always produce non class D amps. 

Could be market forces for both classes at work.

Many homes simply don't have the space for large amplifiers and audio systems.  Period.  That forces the manufacturers to come up with serious alternatives.  Class D was that alternative.  However, back in the day, doing direct comparisons between standard Class A/AB amps and Class D amps with the same system and music, the Class A/AB amps won hands down. 

That's not the case anymore.

Remember, back in the day, Class D was simply not very good. The power supplies and devices were not "there" yet.  So, to get proper class A/AB amps right, proper power supply design was absolutely necessary. skimping on power supply design automatically determined that the amp would be bad.

This was why amps weighed so much. read Nelson Pass' articles on power supply design.  Large transformers (read heavy) were mandatory, proper filter caps (also heavy) and lastly, proper power  supply regulation (almost as complex and heavy as the power supply) were required.  It almost came down to a certain weight per Watt value.

manufacturers didn't' do that for the hell of it.  for proper amp design, it was mandatory. 

Class D amps gets one away from very large/heavy power supply designs. That is not to say that certain manufacturers won't still make the casings extremely heavy, or the heat sinks, etc.

The problem also arises in that most manufacturers don't make their own transistors and tubes.  They have to source them from others.  So you either buy from what is available or you design based on your specs and get companies to make them for you to your specs.

My point is that Class D isn't necessarily the future.  It is "a" future. There  will be other technology  coming that will supplant class D also.

But, if you think Class A or AB is going away, don't bet on that.

Space limitations, size, savings on power supply design and  costs are the driving forces behind class  D. 

I've heard some pretty darn good  class D equipment.  What I don't understand (actually I do) is why they are priced so high. They don't have the extremely expensive power supply  and heat sinks, so where is the expense? 

But are they good?  yes?  Better that like valued Class A or AB?  not so sure.  some yes, some no.  Same can be said for Class A or AB.

Are the top of the line (costs no object) Class D amps equal to or better than the top of the line (costs no object) Class A or AB amps?  that I seriously doubt at this time.

But, one never knows do one?

But, stop dissing Class A or Class AB amps.  The massive weight and size.  Power supply design and massive heat sinking and regulation dictated this was  necessary.  Class D was not good back then.  So, if manufacturers have they plants already set up for Class A/AB and costs is minimized, why change immediately?  Many  are very slowly moving to Class D, but they aren't getting rid of Class A or AB.

sorry for the long rant, but I noticed many getting very heated and I felt a need to slow things down.

If you have no space and don't want large heavy space heaters and you want very nice/decent sound, Class D is the way to go.

But if space isn't an issue for me, I would have to hear the Class D amps side by side against the Class A/AB amps before I make the switch.  Get that, "switch".  just a joke.

enjoy

I have a Class D integrated amp. I compared it to a $10k pre and power amp combo. Power amp is class AB. I also owned this combo. My lowly class D integrated, at one-third the price, humbled that $10k plus amplification. No, I'm not saying I have the best in class D, and no, I'm not saying there isn't better $10k combinations of which I compared. I'm just saying I have proof positive that a modestly priced Class D amp can compete with more expensive class A/AB amplification.